>
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 06:33:53PM +, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > > > - pm_runtime_put(dev);
> > > > + pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
> > >
> > > Change to put_sync is needed so that the idle handshake gets
> completed?
> >
> > Right.
>
> Since we seem to agree that your change to g
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 06:33:53PM +, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > > - pm_runtime_put(dev);
> > > + pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
> >
> > Change to put_sync is needed so that the idle handshake gets completed?
>
> Right.
Since we seem to agree that your change to get rid of the use of PM
runtime sh
> > The correct sequence is to first request locality and only after that
> > perform cmd_ready handshake, otherwise the hardware will drop the
> > subsequent message as from the device point of view the cmd_ready
> > handshake wasn't performed. Symmetrically locality has to be
> > relinquished o
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 01:27:29PM +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> The correct sequence is to first request locality and only after
> that perform cmd_ready handshake, otherwise the hardware will drop
> the subsequent message as from the device point of view the cmd_ready
> handshake wasn't performe
4 matches
Mail list logo