gt; [0.324660] [] acpi_ev_gpe_detect+0x105/0x227
> > [0.324668] [] acpi_ev_sci_xrupt_handler+0x22/0x38
> > [0.324675] [] acpi_irq+0x16/0x31
> > [0.324683] [] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x6f/0x540
> > [0.324691] [] handle_irq_event+0x41/0x70
> > [
0.324743] [] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
> [0.324750] [] default_idle+0x23/0x260
> [ 0.324757] [] arch_cpu_idle+0xf/0x20
> [0.324763] [] cpu_startup_entry+0x36b/0x5b0
> [0.324771] [] start_secondary+0x1a4/0x1d0
>
>
> >
> > Thanks and best re
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 02:34:12AM +, Zheng, Lv wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > From: Kirill A. Shutemov [mailto:kir...@shutemov.name]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 8:16 PM
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:20:11PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, November 18, 2014 03:23:28 PM K
0.324763] [] cpu_startup_entry+0x36b/0x5b0
[0.324771] [] start_secondary+0x1a4/0x1d0
>
> Thanks and best regards
> -Lv
>
> > From: Kirill A. Shutemov [mailto:kir...@shutemov.name]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 8:16 PM
> > To: Rafael J. Wysocki
> >
Hi,
> From: Kirill A. Shutemov [mailto:kir...@shutemov.name]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 8:16 PM
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:20:11PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, November 18, 2014 03:23:28 PM Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 02:52:36AM +,
. Wysocki
> Cc: Zheng, Lv; Wysocki, Rafael J; Brown, Len; Lv Zheng;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] ACPI/EC: Introduce STARTED/STOPPED flags to replace
> BLOCKED flag.
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:20:11PM +0100, Rafael
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:20:11PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 18, 2014 03:23:28 PM Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 02:52:36AM +, Zheng, Lv wrote:
>
> [cut]
>
> >
> > Here's lockdep warning I see on -next:
>
> Is patch [1/6] sufficient to tri
, Len; Lv Zheng;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] ACPI/EC: Introduce STARTED/STOPPED flags to replace
> BLOCKED flag.
>
> On Tuesday, November 18, 2014 03:23:28 PM Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 05,
On Tuesday, November 18, 2014 03:23:28 PM Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 02:52:36AM +, Zheng, Lv wrote:
[cut]
>
> Here's lockdep warning I see on -next:
Is patch [1/6] sufficient to trigger this or do you need all [1-4/6]?
> [0.510159]
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 02:52:36AM +, Zheng, Lv wrote:
> Hi, Rafael
>
> There is one thing I should let you know.
>
> Originally this patchset is dependent on the GPE "dead lock" fix.
> Because this patch will invoke acpi_enable_gpe()/acpi_disable_gpe() with EC
> lock held.
>
> I saw system
Hi, Rafael
There is one thing I should let you know.
Originally this patchset is dependent on the GPE "dead lock" fix.
Because this patch will invoke acpi_enable_gpe()/acpi_disable_gpe() with EC
lock held.
I saw system hang during suspending using only this patchset, so we have to
find a solut
11 matches
Mail list logo
