> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
> > > On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> > > > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> > > > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> > > > a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
> > > > refcounter over
On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
> > On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> > > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> > > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> > > a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
> > > refcounter overflows that m
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Elena Reshetova wrote:
>
> > Subject: kernel: convert futex_pi_state.refcount from atomic_t to refcount_t
>
> Several people including myself told you already, that subjects consist of
>
> SUBSYSTEMPREFIX: Concise description
>
> It's easy enough to figure the prefix out
On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> Subject: kernel: convert futex_pi_state.refcount from atomic_t to refcount_t
Several people including myself told you already, that subjects consist of
SUBSYSTEMPREFIX: Concise description
It's easy enough to figure the prefix out by looking at the
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 12:35:16PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Reshetova, Elena wrote:
>
> > > On Fri, 7 Jul 2017, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 12:04:28PM +0300, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> > > > > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> > > > > used in
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 10:24:20AM +, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
> It is not so trivial as you might think. Unless right person shows up
> as maintainer/supporter when I run get_maintainer script,
In this case though it should:
FUTEX SUBSYSTEM
M: Thomas Gleixner
M: Ingo Molnar
R:
* Reshetova, Elena wrote:
> > On Fri, 7 Jul 2017, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 12:04:28PM +0300, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> > > > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> > > > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> > > > a reference counter. T
> On Fri, 7 Jul 2017, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 12:04:28PM +0300, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> > > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> > > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> > > a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
> > > refc
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 12:04:28PM +0300, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> > a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
> > refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
> > si
On Fri, 7 Jul 2017, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 12:04:28PM +0300, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> > a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
> > refcounter overflo
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 12:04:28PM +0300, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
> refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
> situations.
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
