On 28 November 2017 02:07, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 11/27/2017 05:38 PM, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 3:10 AM, Adam Thomson
> > wrote:
> >> On 16 November 2017 01:02, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
> >>
> >>> At present, TCPM code assumes that local device supports
>
On 28 November 2017 01:38, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
> > examples in the kernel where this happens. Where are these functions likely
> > to
> > be called from, as wherever that is it will need a reference to the port?
> > Actually should we be adding DT bindings to set supported src/snk PDOs
On 11/27/2017 05:38 PM, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 3:10 AM, Adam Thomson
wrote:
On 16 November 2017 01:02, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
At present, TCPM code assumes that local device supports
variable/batt pdos and always selects the pdo with highest
possible powe
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 3:10 AM, Adam Thomson
wrote:
> On 16 November 2017 01:02, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
>
>> At present, TCPM code assumes that local device supports
>> variable/batt pdos and always selects the pdo with highest
>> possible power within the board limit. This assumption
>> m
On 16 November 2017 01:02, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
> At present, TCPM code assumes that local device supports
> variable/batt pdos and always selects the pdo with highest
> possible power within the board limit. This assumption
> might not hold good for all devices. To overcome this,
> this
5 matches
Mail list logo