t; ; Linux Kernel Mailing List
> ; Jae Hyun Yoo
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] aspeed-video: clear spurious interrupt bits
> unconditionally
>
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 08:53:33PM CST, Ryan Chen wrote:
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Joel Stanley
> >&
; linux-aspeed
; Linux Kernel Mailing List
; Jae Hyun Yoo
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] aspeed-video: clear spurious interrupt bits
unconditionally
On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 at 19:14, Zev Weiss wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 10:47:37PM CST, Joel Stanley wrote:
> >On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 at 02:4
t; ; Linux Kernel Mailing List
> ; Jae Hyun Yoo
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] aspeed-video: clear spurious interrupt bits
> unconditionally
>
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 at 19:14, Zev Weiss wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 10:47:37PM CST, Joel Stanley w
On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 at 19:14, Zev Weiss wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 10:47:37PM CST, Joel Stanley wrote:
> >On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 at 02:46, Zev Weiss wrote:
> >>
> >> Instead of testing and conditionally clearing them one by one, we can
> >> instead just unconditionally clear them all at
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 10:47:37PM CST, Joel Stanley wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 at 02:46, Zev Weiss wrote:
Instead of testing and conditionally clearing them one by one, we can
instead just unconditionally clear them all at once.
Signed-off-by: Zev Weiss
I had a poke at the assembly and
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 at 02:46, Zev Weiss wrote:
>
> Instead of testing and conditionally clearing them one by one, we can
> instead just unconditionally clear them all at once.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zev Weiss
I had a poke at the assembly and it looks like GCC is clearing the
bits unconditionally
6 matches
Mail list logo