On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 12:33:32PM +0100, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 09:44:47AM +, David Laight wrote:
> > From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu
> > > When checking whether a bit representing a register is set in
> > > sample_regs, a 64-bit mask, use 64-bit value (1LL).
> > >
> > >
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 09:44:47AM +, David Laight wrote:
> From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu
> > When checking whether a bit representing a register is set in
> > sample_regs, a 64-bit mask, use 64-bit value (1LL).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu
> > ---
> > tools/perf/util/unwind.c |
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu
> When checking whether a bit representing a register is set in
> sample_regs, a 64-bit mask, use 64-bit value (1LL).
>
> Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu
> ---
> tools/perf/util/unwind.c |4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu
When checking whether a bit representing a register is set in
sample_regs, a 64-bit mask, use 64-bit value (1LL).
Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu suka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
tools/perf/util/unwind.c |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 09:44:47AM +, David Laight wrote:
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu
When checking whether a bit representing a register is set in
sample_regs, a 64-bit mask, use 64-bit value (1LL).
Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu suka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 12:33:32PM +0100, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 09:44:47AM +, David Laight wrote:
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu
When checking whether a bit representing a register is set in
sample_regs, a 64-bit mask, use 64-bit value (1LL).
Signed-off-by:
6 matches
Mail list logo