Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf: Use 64-bit value when comparing sample_regs

2014-03-06 Thread Jiri Olsa
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 12:33:32PM +0100, Gabriel Paubert wrote: > On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 09:44:47AM +, David Laight wrote: > > From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu > > > When checking whether a bit representing a register is set in > > > sample_regs, a 64-bit mask, use 64-bit value (1LL). > > > > > >

Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf: Use 64-bit value when comparing sample_regs

2014-03-06 Thread Gabriel Paubert
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 09:44:47AM +, David Laight wrote: > From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu > > When checking whether a bit representing a register is set in > > sample_regs, a 64-bit mask, use 64-bit value (1LL). > > > > Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu > > --- > > tools/perf/util/unwind.c |

RE: [PATCH 3/3] perf: Use 64-bit value when comparing sample_regs

2014-03-06 Thread David Laight
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu > When checking whether a bit representing a register is set in > sample_regs, a 64-bit mask, use 64-bit value (1LL). > > Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu > --- > tools/perf/util/unwind.c |4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git

RE: [PATCH 3/3] perf: Use 64-bit value when comparing sample_regs

2014-03-06 Thread David Laight
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu When checking whether a bit representing a register is set in sample_regs, a 64-bit mask, use 64-bit value (1LL). Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu suka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com --- tools/perf/util/unwind.c |4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2

Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf: Use 64-bit value when comparing sample_regs

2014-03-06 Thread Gabriel Paubert
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 09:44:47AM +, David Laight wrote: From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu When checking whether a bit representing a register is set in sample_regs, a 64-bit mask, use 64-bit value (1LL). Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu suka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com ---

Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf: Use 64-bit value when comparing sample_regs

2014-03-06 Thread Jiri Olsa
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 12:33:32PM +0100, Gabriel Paubert wrote: On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 09:44:47AM +, David Laight wrote: From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu When checking whether a bit representing a register is set in sample_regs, a 64-bit mask, use 64-bit value (1LL). Signed-off-by: