RE: [PATCH 3/5] i2c: aspeed: Mask IRQ status to relevant bits

2020-08-25 Thread Ryan Chen
; Rob Herring ; > linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-in...@vger.kernel.org; Ryan Chen > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] i2c: aspeed: Mask IRQ status to relevant bits > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 02:47:51PM -0500, Eddie James wrote: > > > > On 8/25/20 1:38 AM, Joel Stanley wrote: >

Re: [PATCH 3/5] i2c: aspeed: Mask IRQ status to relevant bits

2020-08-25 Thread Tao Ren
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 02:47:51PM -0500, Eddie James wrote: > > On 8/25/20 1:38 AM, Joel Stanley wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 at 16:12, Eddie James wrote: > > > Mask the IRQ status to only the bits that the driver checks. This > > > prevents excessive driver warnings when operating in slave mo

Re: [PATCH 3/5] i2c: aspeed: Mask IRQ status to relevant bits

2020-08-25 Thread Eddie James
On 8/25/20 1:38 AM, Joel Stanley wrote: On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 at 16:12, Eddie James wrote: Mask the IRQ status to only the bits that the driver checks. This prevents excessive driver warnings when operating in slave mode when additional bits are set that the driver doesn't handle. Signed-off-b

Re: [PATCH 3/5] i2c: aspeed: Mask IRQ status to relevant bits

2020-08-24 Thread Joel Stanley
On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 at 16:12, Eddie James wrote: > > Mask the IRQ status to only the bits that the driver checks. This > prevents excessive driver warnings when operating in slave mode > when additional bits are set that the driver doesn't handle. > > Signed-off-by: Eddie James > --- > drivers/i

Re: [PATCH 3/5] i2c: aspeed: Mask IRQ status to relevant bits

2020-08-20 Thread Wolfram Sang
> + irq_received &= 0xf000; Can we have a define for this? Like ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_MASTER_IRQS or something? signature.asc Description: PGP signature