On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 03:01:29 +
"Tian, Kevin" wrote:
> > From: Lu Baolu
> > Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2020 3:26 PM
> >
> > On 2020/6/23 23:43, Jacob Pan wrote:
> > > DevTLB flush can be used for both DMA request with and without
> > > PASIDs. The former uses PASID#0 (RID2PASID), latter
On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 15:25:57 +0800
Lu Baolu wrote:
> On 2020/6/23 23:43, Jacob Pan wrote:
> > DevTLB flush can be used for both DMA request with and without
> > PASIDs. The former uses PASID#0 (RID2PASID), latter uses non-zero
> > PASID for SVA usage.
> >
> > This patch adds a check for PASID
> From: Lu Baolu
> Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2020 3:26 PM
>
> On 2020/6/23 23:43, Jacob Pan wrote:
> > DevTLB flush can be used for both DMA request with and without PASIDs.
> > The former uses PASID#0 (RID2PASID), latter uses non-zero PASID for SVA
> > usage.
> >
> > This patch adds a check for
On 2020/6/23 23:43, Jacob Pan wrote:
DevTLB flush can be used for both DMA request with and without PASIDs.
The former uses PASID#0 (RID2PASID), latter uses non-zero PASID for SVA
usage.
This patch adds a check for PASID value such that devTLB flush with
PASID is used for SVA case. This is more
4 matches
Mail list logo