On 3/29/21 4:14 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.11.11 release.
There are 252 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 12:14:20PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.11.11 release.
> There are 252 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 15:45, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.11.11 release.
> There are 252 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On 29.03.21 16:46, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 04:40:00PM +0200, Ronald Warsow wrote:
hello
5.11.11-rc2 compiles, boots and run fine here (on an i7-6700 with Fedora
34 Beta)
Thanks.
but I see some error's/warning's with the new gcc-11.0.1 compared to the
elder gcc-10.2.1-11
Do
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 04:40:00PM +0200, Ronald Warsow wrote:
> hello
>
> 5.11.11-rc2 compiles, boots and run fine here (on an i7-6700 with Fedora
> 34 Beta)
>
> Thanks.
>
> but I see some error's/warning's with the new gcc-11.0.1 compared to the
> elder gcc-10.2.1-11
Do you also see those
hello
5.11.11-rc2 compiles, boots and run fine here (on an i7-6700 with Fedora
34 Beta)
Thanks.
but I see some error's/warning's with the new gcc-11.0.1 compared to the
elder gcc-10.2.1-11
In function ‘poly1305_simd_init’,
inlined from ‘crypto_poly1305_setdctxkey’ at
6 matches
Mail list logo
