Re: [PATCH 6/6] watchdog: sama5d4: try to set timeout from device tree first

2015-10-12 Thread Sylvain Rochet
; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Ferre, > > Nicolas; Desroches, Ludovic; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; Yang, > > Wenyou; Wim Van Sebroeck > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] watchdog: sama5d4: try to set timeout from device > > tree > > first > > > > H

Re: [PATCH 6/6] watchdog: sama5d4: try to set timeout from device tree first

2015-10-12 Thread Sylvain Rochet
Hi Alexandre, On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 09:50:01AM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > Hi Sylvain, > > The rest of the series looks good to me, one comment below: > > On 08/10/2015 at 23:34:34 +0200, Sylvain Rochet wrote : > > watchdog_init_timeout function doesn't try to get the "timeout-sec" DT >

RE: [PATCH 6/6] watchdog: sama5d4: try to set timeout from device tree first

2015-10-12 Thread Yang, Wenyou
nfradead.org; Yang, > Wenyou; Wim Van Sebroeck > Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] watchdog: sama5d4: try to set timeout from device > tree > first > > Hi Sylvain, > > The rest of the series looks good to me, one comment below: > > On 08/10/2015 at 23:34:34 +0200, Sylvain R

Re: [PATCH 6/6] watchdog: sama5d4: try to set timeout from device tree first

2015-10-12 Thread Alexandre Belloni
Hi Sylvain, The rest of the series looks good to me, one comment below: On 08/10/2015 at 23:34:34 +0200, Sylvain Rochet wrote : > watchdog_init_timeout function doesn't try to get the "timeout-sec" DT > property if timeout_parm is not zero. This change makes this DT property > working for the sam