On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:40 AM, Don Dutile wrote:
> On 05/22/2013 04:16 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
[...]
>> Hi Alex, all, so to clarify:
>>
>> 1. currently due to current firmware limitation we must call
>> pci_enable_sriov before the
>> PF ends its initialization sequence done in the PCI probe call
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 2:45 AM, Ben Hutchings
wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 23:16 +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> [...]
>> all in all, we will look into returning -EPROBE_DEFER from the VF
>> when they identify the problematic situation -- so for how much time
>> this is deferred? or if this isn't t
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 23:16 +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
[...]
> all in all, we will look into returning -EPROBE_DEFER from the VF
> when they identify the problematic situation -- so for how much time
> this is deferred? or if this isn't time based what the logical
> condition which once met the VF p
On 05/22/2013 04:16 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 1:30 AM, Alexander Duyck
wrote:
On 05/21/2013 03:11 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 03:01:08PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
On 05/21/2013 02:49 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 05:3
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 1:30 AM, Alexander Duyck
wrote:
> On 05/21/2013 03:11 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 03:01:08PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>>> On 05/21/2013 02:49 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 05:30:32PM -0400, Don Dutile wrote:
>>>
On 05/21/2013 03:11 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 03:01:08PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> On 05/21/2013 02:49 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 05:30:32PM -0400, Don Dutile wrote:
On 05/14/2013 05:39 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On 05/1
On 05/21/2013 03:09 PM, Don Dutile wrote:
> On 05/21/2013 05:58 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> On 05/21/2013 02:31 PM, Don Dutile wrote:
>>> On 05/21/2013 05:30 PM, Don Dutile wrote:
On 05/14/2013 05:39 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On 05/14/2013 12:59 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On Tue, Ma
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 03:01:08PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On 05/21/2013 02:49 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 05:30:32PM -0400, Don Dutile wrote:
> >> On 05/14/2013 05:39 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> >>> On 05/14/2013 12:59 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Tue, May
On 05/21/2013 05:58 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
On 05/21/2013 02:31 PM, Don Dutile wrote:
On 05/21/2013 05:30 PM, Don Dutile wrote:
On 05/14/2013 05:39 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
On 05/14/2013 12:59 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Alexander Duyck
wrote:
On 05/14/2013
On 05/21/2013 02:49 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 05:30:32PM -0400, Don Dutile wrote:
>> On 05/14/2013 05:39 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>>> On 05/14/2013 12:59 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Alexander Duyck
wrote:
> On 05/14/2013 11
On 05/21/2013 02:31 PM, Don Dutile wrote:
> On 05/21/2013 05:30 PM, Don Dutile wrote:
>> On 05/14/2013 05:39 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>>> On 05/14/2013 12:59 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Alexander Duyck
wrote:
> On 05/14/2013 11:44 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 05:30:32PM -0400, Don Dutile wrote:
> On 05/14/2013 05:39 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> >On 05/14/2013 12:59 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >>On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Alexander Duyck
> >> wrote:
> >>>On 05/14/2013 11:44 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9
On 05/21/2013 05:30 PM, Don Dutile wrote:
On 05/14/2013 05:39 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
On 05/14/2013 12:59 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Alexander Duyck
wrote:
On 05/14/2013 11:44 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Alexander Duyck
wrote:
I'm
On 05/14/2013 05:39 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
On 05/14/2013 12:59 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Alexander Duyck
wrote:
On 05/14/2013 11:44 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Alexander Duyck
wrote:
I'm sorry, but what is the point of this patc
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 12:56:42AM -0400, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> Please note that this whole lockdep warning was identified as false
> positive by Tejun http://www.spinics.net/lists/li
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 12:56:42AM -0400, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>> > > Please note that this whole lockdep warning was identified as false
>> > > positive by Tejun http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pci/msg21568.html
>> >
>> > No, at least one time,
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 12:56:42AM -0400, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> > > Please note that this whole lockdep warning was identified as false
> > > positive by Tejun http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pci/msg21568.html
> >
> > No, at least one time, I noticed there is one real hang happens.
>
> Tejun, so
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 07:28:25PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> Found kernel try to load mlx4 drivers for VFs before
> PF's is really loaded when the drivers are built-in, and kernel
> command line include probe_vfs=63, num_vfs=63.
>
> It turns that it also happen for hotadd path even drivers are
>
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >
> >> BTW, do you have any plan to make mlx4 support sriov_configure via
> >> sysfs?
> >
> > yes we do, we're waiting for a firmwa
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
>> BTW, do you have any plan to make mlx4 support sriov_configure via sysfs?
>
> yes we do, we're waiting for a firmware change that will allow for
> such a patch to get working.
>
> Please
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> BTW, do you have any plan to make mlx4 support sriov_configure via sysfs?
yes we do, we're waiting for a firmware change that will allow for
such a patch to get working.
Please note that this whole lockdep warning was identified as false
pos
On 05/14/2013 12:59 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Alexander Duyck
> wrote:
>> On 05/14/2013 11:44 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Alexander Duyck
>>> wrote:
I'm sorry, but what is the point of this patch? With device assignment
it
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Alexander Duyck
wrote:
> On 05/14/2013 11:44 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Alexander Duyck
>> wrote:
>>> I'm sorry, but what is the point of this patch? With device assignment
>>> it is always possible to have VFs loaded and the PF d
On 05/14/2013 11:44 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Alexander Duyck
> wrote:
>> On 05/13/2013 07:28 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>> Found kernel try to load mlx4 drivers for VFs before
>>> PF's is really loaded when the drivers are built-in, and kernel
>>> command line include p
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Alexander Duyck
wrote:
> On 05/13/2013 07:28 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> Found kernel try to load mlx4 drivers for VFs before
>> PF's is really loaded when the drivers are built-in, and kernel
>> command line include probe_vfs=63, num_vfs=63.
>>
>> It turns that it al
On 05/13/2013 07:28 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> Found kernel try to load mlx4 drivers for VFs before
> PF's is really loaded when the drivers are built-in, and kernel
> command line include probe_vfs=63, num_vfs=63.
>
> It turns that it also happen for hotadd path even drivers are
> compiled as modules
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Yan Burman wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org]
>> On Behalf Of Yinghai Lu
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 05:31
>> To: Bjorn Helgaas
>> Cc: Gu Zheng; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-ke
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 2:46 AM, Perla, Sathya wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: linux-pci-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-pci-
>> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Yinghai Lu
>>
>> Found kernel try to load mlx4 drivers for VFs before PF's is really loaded
>> when the drivers a
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-pci-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-pci-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Yinghai Lu
>
> Found kernel try to load mlx4 drivers for VFs before PF's is really loaded
> when the drivers are built-in, and kernel command line include
> probe_vfs=63,
> -Original Message-
> From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org]
> On Behalf Of Yinghai Lu
> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 05:31
> To: Bjorn Helgaas
> Cc: Gu Zheng; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Yinghai
> Lu; net...@vger.kernel.org
>
30 matches
Mail list logo
