Re: [PATCH RFC] setns: return 0 directly if try to reassociate with current namespace

"Chen, Hanxiao" writes: >> -Original Message- >> From: Eric W. Biederman [mailto:ebied...@xmission.com] >> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2014 1:56 AM >> >> Serge Hallyn writes: >> >> > Quoting Chen Hanxiao (chenhanx...@cn.fujitsu.com): >> >> We could use setns to join the current ns, >>

RE: [PATCH RFC] setns: return 0 directly if try to reassociate with current namespace

> -Original Message- > From: Eric W. Biederman [mailto:ebied...@xmission.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2014 1:56 AM > > Serge Hallyn writes: > > > Quoting Chen Hanxiao (chenhanx...@cn.fujitsu.com): > >> We could use setns to join the current ns, > >> which did a lot of unnecessary

Re: [PATCH RFC] setns: return 0 directly if try to reassociate with current namespace

Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebied...@xmission.com): > Serge Hallyn writes: > > > Quoting Chen Hanxiao (chenhanx...@cn.fujitsu.com): > >> We could use setns to join the current ns, > >> which did a lot of unnecessary work. > >> This patch will check this senario and > >> return 0 directly. > >> >

Re: [PATCH RFC] setns: return 0 directly if try to reassociate with current namespace

Serge Hallyn writes: > Quoting Chen Hanxiao (chenhanx...@cn.fujitsu.com): >> We could use setns to join the current ns, >> which did a lot of unnecessary work. >> This patch will check this senario and >> return 0 directly. >> >> Signed-off-by: Chen Hanxiao > > Plus it's just asking for trouble

Re: [PATCH RFC] setns: return 0 directly if try to reassociate with current namespace

Quoting Chen Hanxiao (chenhanx...@cn.fujitsu.com): > We could use setns to join the current ns, > which did a lot of unnecessary work. > This patch will check this senario and > return 0 directly. > > Signed-off-by: Chen Hanxiao Plus it's just asking for trouble. I would ack this, except you ne