On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 10:12:13AM -0500, Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote:
> These messages are not "high volumn". What I am trying to achieve
> is for users to be able to just send the errors to developers once
> they are encountered without having to tell them to go back and
> reboot with the
On 4/9/2013 4:41 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 07:06:50PM -0500, Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote:
From: Suravee Suthikulpanit
Add logic to decode AMD IOMMU event flag based on information from AMD IOMMU
specification.
This should simplify debugging IOMMU errors. Also, dump
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 07:06:50PM -0500, Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote:
> From: Suravee Suthikulpanit
>
> Add logic to decode AMD IOMMU event flag based on information from AMD IOMMU
> specification.
> This should simplify debugging IOMMU errors. Also, dump DTE information in
> additional
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 07:06:50PM -0500, Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote:
From: Suravee Suthikulpanit suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com
Add logic to decode AMD IOMMU event flag based on information from AMD IOMMU
specification.
This should simplify debugging IOMMU errors. Also, dump DTE
On 4/9/2013 4:41 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 07:06:50PM -0500, Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote:
From: Suravee Suthikulpanit suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com
Add logic to decode AMD IOMMU event flag based on information from AMD IOMMU
specification.
This should simplify debugging
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 10:12:13AM -0500, Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote:
These messages are not high volumn. What I am trying to achieve
is for users to be able to just send the errors to developers once
they are encountered without having to tell them to go back and
reboot with the
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 10:43:45AM -0500, Suravee Suthikulanit wrote:
> On 4/8/2013 9:50 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >Independent from Joerg's feedback on this, I have only one question:
> >you're not seriously considering on dumping this "Note:..." line above
> >on*every* IO-PF, right?
> If you
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 02:33:32PM +, Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote:
> Joerg,
>
> Do you have any more feedback about this patch?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Suravee
>
> From: suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com [suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April
Joerg,
Do you have any more feedback about this patch?
Thanks,
Suravee
From: suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com [suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 7:06 PM
To: io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; j...@8bytes.org
Cc:
Joerg,
Do you have any more feedback about this patch?
Thanks,
Suravee
From: suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com [suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 7:06 PM
To: io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; j...@8bytes.org
Cc:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 02:33:32PM +, Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote:
Joerg,
Do you have any more feedback about this patch?
Thanks,
Suravee
From: suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com [suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 10:43:45AM -0500, Suravee Suthikulanit wrote:
On 4/8/2013 9:50 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
Independent from Joerg's feedback on this, I have only one question:
you're not seriously considering on dumping this Note:... line above
on*every* IO-PF, right?
If you think
12 matches
Mail list logo
