>
> Em Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 10:39:18AM -0500, kan.li...@intel.com escreveu:
> > From: Kan Liang
> >
> > Currently, the perf diff only works with same binaries. That's because
> > it compares the symbol start address. It doesn't work if the perf.data
> > comes from different binaries. This
Em Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 10:39:18AM -0500, kan.li...@intel.com escreveu:
From: Kan Liang kan.li...@intel.com
Currently, the perf diff only works with same binaries. That's because
it compares the symbol start address. It doesn't work if the perf.data
comes from different binaries.
> Em Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 11:53:56AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> escreveu:
> > Em Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 10:39:18AM -0500, kan.li...@intel.com escreveu:
> > > Currently, the perf diff only works with same binaries. That's
> > > because it compares the symbol start address. It doesn't work if
Em Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 11:53:56AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
escreveu:
Em Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 10:39:18AM -0500, kan.li...@intel.com escreveu:
Currently, the perf diff only works with same binaries. That's
because it compares the symbol start address. It doesn't work if the
> Em Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 10:39:18AM -0500, kan.li...@intel.com escreveu:
> > From: Kan Liang
> >
> > Currently, the perf diff only works with same binaries. That's because
> > it compares the symbol start address. It doesn't work if the perf.data
> > comes from different binaries. This patch
Em Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 11:53:56AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 10:39:18AM -0500, kan.li...@intel.com escreveu:
> > Currently, the perf diff only works with same binaries. That's because
> > it compares the symbol start address. It doesn't work if the
Em Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 10:39:18AM -0500, kan.li...@intel.com escreveu:
> From: Kan Liang
>
> Currently, the perf diff only works with same binaries. That's because
> it compares the symbol start address. It doesn't work if the perf.data
> comes from different binaries. This patch matches the
Em Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 10:39:18AM -0500, kan.li...@intel.com escreveu:
From: Kan Liang kan.li...@intel.com
Currently, the perf diff only works with same binaries. That's because
it compares the symbol start address. It doesn't work if the perf.data
comes from different binaries. This patch
Em Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 11:53:56AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
Em Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 10:39:18AM -0500, kan.li...@intel.com escreveu:
Currently, the perf diff only works with same binaries. That's because
it compares the symbol start address. It doesn't work if the perf.data
Em Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 10:39:18AM -0500, kan.li...@intel.com escreveu:
From: Kan Liang kan.li...@intel.com
Currently, the perf diff only works with same binaries. That's because
it compares the symbol start address. It doesn't work if the perf.data
comes from different binaries. This
Hi Arnaldo,
The patch is one month old. Kim and Jirka have reviewed it.
There is also another perf diff related patch which has similar situation.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/1/380
It was also reviewed by Jirka a month ago.
Both of them still apply to current perf/core.
Should I re-post
Hi Arnaldo,
The patch is one month old. Kim and Jirka have reviewed it.
There is also another perf diff related patch which has similar situation.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/1/380
It was also reviewed by Jirka a month ago.
Both of them still apply to current perf/core.
Should I re-post
12 matches
Mail list logo
