Re: [PATCH bisect 2/2] ASoC: fsl_sai: Separately enable interrupts for Tx and Rx streams

2014-04-01 Thread Nicolin Chen
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 05:42:54PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 09:21:57PM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote: > > > Sir, I just rebased my for-next branch again and found that it's missing > > two applied patches: "ASoC: fsl_sai: Add isr to deal with error flag" and > > "ASoC: fsl_sa

Re: [PATCH bisect 2/2] ASoC: fsl_sai: Separately enable interrupts for Tx and Rx streams

2014-04-01 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 09:21:57PM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote: > Sir, I just rebased my for-next branch again and found that it's missing > two applied patches: "ASoC: fsl_sai: Add isr to deal with error flag" and > "ASoC: fsl_sai: Improve fsl_sai_isr()", so that's why this PATCH-2 could > not be a

Re: [PATCH bisect 2/2] ASoC: fsl_sai: Separately enable interrupts for Tx and Rx streams

2014-04-01 Thread Nicolin Chen
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 01:07:15PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 11:17:07AM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote: > > We only enable one side interrupt for each stream since over/underrun > > on the opposite stream would be resulted from what we previously did, > > enabling TERE but remai

Re: [PATCH bisect 2/2] ASoC: fsl_sai: Separately enable interrupts for Tx and Rx streams

2014-04-01 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 11:17:07AM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote: > We only enable one side interrupt for each stream since over/underrun > on the opposite stream would be resulted from what we previously did, > enabling TERE but remaining FRDE disabled, even though the xrun on the > opposite direction

RE: [PATCH bisect 2/2] ASoC: fsl_sai: Separately enable interrupts for Tx and Rx streams

2014-03-31 Thread dongsheng.w...@freescale.com
ernel@vger.kernel.org; ti...@tabi.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH bisect 2/2] ASoC: fsl_sai: Separately enable interrupts > for > Tx and Rx streams > > On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 11:48:16AM +0800, Wang Dongsheng-B40534 wrote: > > > > > > > -Original Message- &g

RE: [PATCH bisect 2/2] ASoC: fsl_sai: Separately enable interrupts for Tx and Rx streams

2014-03-31 Thread dongsheng.w...@freescale.com
ernel@vger.kernel.org; ti...@tabi.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH bisect 2/2] ASoC: fsl_sai: Separately enable interrupts > for > Tx and Rx streams > > On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 11:25:02AM +0800, Wang Dongsheng-B40534 wrote: > > > Subject: [PATCH bisect 2/2] ASoC: fsl_sai: Separatel

Re: [PATCH bisect 2/2] ASoC: fsl_sai: Separately enable interrupts for Tx and Rx streams

2014-03-31 Thread Nicolin Chen
nel.org; alsa-de...@alsa-project.org; Xiubo Li-B47053; > > linuxppc- > > d...@lists.ozlabs.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; ti...@tabi.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH bisect 2/2] ASoC: fsl_sai: Separately enable interrupts > > for > > Tx and Rx streams > > &

Re: [PATCH bisect 2/2] ASoC: fsl_sai: Separately enable interrupts for Tx and Rx streams

2014-03-31 Thread Nicolin Chen
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 11:25:02AM +0800, Wang Dongsheng-B40534 wrote: > > Subject: [PATCH bisect 2/2] ASoC: fsl_sai: Separately enable interrupts for > > Tx > > and Rx streams > > > > We only enable one side interrupt for each stream since over/underrun > > on the opposite stream would be result

RE: [PATCH bisect 2/2] ASoC: fsl_sai: Separately enable interrupts for Tx and Rx streams

2014-03-31 Thread dongsheng.w...@freescale.com
> -Original Message- > From: Linuxppc-dev [mailto:linuxppc-dev- > bounces+b40534=freescale@lists.ozlabs.org] On Behalf Of Nicolin Chen > Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 11:17 AM > To: broo...@kernel.org > Cc: alsa-de...@alsa-project.org; Xiubo Li-B47053; > linuxppc-...@lists.ozlabs.org