On 04/07/2018 21:37, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 04/07/2018 15:06, Jingqi Liu wrote:
> > A new control bit(bit 29) in the TEST_CTRL MSR will be introduced to
> > enable detection of split locks.
> >
> > When bit 29 of the TEST_CTRL(33H) MSR is set, the processor causes an
> > #AC exception to be
On 04/07/2018 21:37, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 04/07/2018 15:06, Jingqi Liu wrote:
> > A new control bit(bit 29) in the TEST_CTRL MSR will be introduced to
> > enable detection of split locks.
> >
> > When bit 29 of the TEST_CTRL(33H) MSR is set, the processor causes an
> > #AC exception to be
Hi Jingqi,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on kvm/linux-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.18-rc3 next-20180704]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
Hi Jingqi,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on kvm/linux-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.18-rc3 next-20180704]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
Hi Jingqi,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on kvm/linux-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.18-rc3 next-20180704]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
Hi Jingqi,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on kvm/linux-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.18-rc3 next-20180704]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 04/07/2018 16:51, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > There is no rush for this to be in KVM/QEMU now because all what exists for
> > this new split lock thing is 'silicon' running on an emulator. And w/o
> > support in the kernel proper this is completely
On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 04/07/2018 16:51, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > There is no rush for this to be in KVM/QEMU now because all what exists for
> > this new split lock thing is 'silicon' running on an emulator. And w/o
> > support in the kernel proper this is completely
On 04/07/2018 16:51, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> There is no rush for this to be in KVM/QEMU now because all what exists for
> this new split lock thing is 'silicon' running on an emulator. And w/o
> support in the kernel proper this is completely useless.
That's good. I assumed it was IceLake, in
On 04/07/2018 16:51, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> There is no rush for this to be in KVM/QEMU now because all what exists for
> this new split lock thing is 'silicon' running on an emulator. And w/o
> support in the kernel proper this is completely useless.
That's good. I assumed it was IceLake, in
On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 04/07/2018 15:06, Jingqi Liu wrote:
> > A new control bit(bit 29) in the TEST_CTRL MSR will be introduced
> > to enable detection of split locks.
> >
> > When bit 29 of the TEST_CTRL(33H) MSR is set, the processor
> > causes an #AC exception to be
On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 04/07/2018 15:06, Jingqi Liu wrote:
> > A new control bit(bit 29) in the TEST_CTRL MSR will be introduced
> > to enable detection of split locks.
> >
> > When bit 29 of the TEST_CTRL(33H) MSR is set, the processor
> > causes an #AC exception to be
On 04/07/2018 15:06, Jingqi Liu wrote:
> A new control bit(bit 29) in the TEST_CTRL MSR will be introduced
> to enable detection of split locks.
>
> When bit 29 of the TEST_CTRL(33H) MSR is set, the processor
> causes an #AC exception to be issued instead of suppressing LOCK on
> bus(during split
On 04/07/2018 15:06, Jingqi Liu wrote:
> A new control bit(bit 29) in the TEST_CTRL MSR will be introduced
> to enable detection of split locks.
>
> When bit 29 of the TEST_CTRL(33H) MSR is set, the processor
> causes an #AC exception to be issued instead of suppressing LOCK on
> bus(during split
14 matches
Mail list logo
