jeev
> Cc: d...@gentoo.org; k...@deine-taler.de;
> linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> net...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] zd1211rw: replace ZD_ASSERT with
> lockdep_assert_held()
>
> On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 15:39 +0530, Sanjeev Shar
vger.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; net...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] zd1211rw: replace ZD_ASSERT with lockdep_assert_held()
>
> On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 15:39 +0530, Sanjeev Sharma wrote:
>> on some architecture spin_is_locked() always return false in
On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 10:36 +, Sharma, Sanjeev wrote:
> > - ZD_ASSERT(!spin_is_locked(&mac->lock));
> > + lockdep_assert_held(&mac->lock);
> >Look closely at this again.
>
> I didn't understand where I put wrong logic ?
Ok, that's fine. But please send a new patch only when you've und
] zd1211rw: replace ZD_ASSERT with lockdep_assert_held()
On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 15:39 +0530, Sanjeev Sharma wrote:
> on some architecture spin_is_locked() always return false in
> uniprocessor configuration and therefore it would be advise to replace
> with lockdep_assert_held().
>
>
On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 15:39 +0530, Sanjeev Sharma wrote:
> on some architecture spin_is_locked() always return false in
> uniprocessor configuration and therefore it would be advise
> to replace with lockdep_assert_held().
>
> Signed-off-by: Sanjeev Sharma
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - corrected t
5 matches
Mail list logo
