>Quoting Peter Chen (2016-08-06 00:54:35)
>> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 02:53:56PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> > Quoting Peter Chen (2016-07-08 02:45:28)
>> > > On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 03:20:59PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> > > > We don't call hw_device_reset() with the ci->lock held, so it
>> > >
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 02:53:56PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Peter Chen (2016-07-08 02:45:28)
> > On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 03:20:59PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > We don't call hw_device_reset() with the ci->lock held, so it
> > > doesn't seem like this lock here is protecting anythin
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 03:20:59PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> We don't call hw_device_reset() with the ci->lock held, so it
> doesn't seem like this lock here is protecting anything. Let's
> just remove it. This allows us to call sleeping functions like
> phy_init() from within the CI_HDRC_CONTRO
3 matches
Mail list logo
