Hi, Rafael
I reconsidered your comments.
Seems there are several problems you might not be aware of.
Let me reply again.
> From: linux-acpi-ow...@vger.kernel.org
> [mailto:linux-acpi-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Rafael J.
> Wysocki
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ACPICA:
Hi, Rafael
I reconsidered your comments.
Seems there are several problems you might not be aware of.
Let me reply again.
> From: linux-acpi-ow...@vger.kernel.org
> [mailto:linux-acpi-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Rafael J.
> Wysocki
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ACPICA:
Hi, Rafael
> From: linux-acpi-ow...@vger.kernel.org
> [mailto:linux-acpi-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Rafael J.
> Wysocki
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ACPICA: Tables: Fix regression introduced by a
> too early mechanism
> enabling
>
> On Thursday, April 27, 2
Hi, Rafael
> From: linux-acpi-ow...@vger.kernel.org
> [mailto:linux-acpi-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Rafael J.
> Wysocki
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ACPICA: Tables: Fix regression introduced by a
> too early mechanism
> enabling
>
> On Thursday, April 27, 2
On Thursday, April 27, 2017 04:22:44 PM Lv Zheng wrote:
> In the Linux kernel side, acpi_get_table() clones haven't been fully
> balanced by acpi_put_table() invocations. In ACPICA side, due to the design
> change, there are also unbalanced acpi_get_table_by_index() invocations
> requiring special
On Thursday, April 27, 2017 04:22:44 PM Lv Zheng wrote:
> In the Linux kernel side, acpi_get_table() clones haven't been fully
> balanced by acpi_put_table() invocations. In ACPICA side, due to the design
> change, there are also unbalanced acpi_get_table_by_index() invocations
> requiring special
6 matches
Mail list logo
