nel.org;
> devicet...@vger.kernel.org; r...@kernel.org; mark.rutl...@arm.com;
> shawn...@kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org;
> computersforpe...@gmail.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] spi: spi-mem: Add driver for NXP FlexSPI
> controller
>
&
nel.org;
> devicet...@vger.kernel.org; r...@kernel.org; mark.rutl...@arm.com;
> shawn...@kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org;
> computersforpe...@gmail.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] spi: spi-mem: Add driver for NXP FlexSPI
> controller
>
&
Hi Yogesh,
On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:34:18 +
Yogesh Narayan Gaur wrote:
> >
> > Do we really need all those macros for registers and modes, that
> > aren't even used in the driver? I don't know what the common
> > practice is, but to me it seems like removing all the unused macros
> > would
Hi Yogesh,
On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:34:18 +
Yogesh Narayan Gaur wrote:
> >
> > Do we really need all those macros for registers and modes, that
> > aren't even used in the driver? I don't know what the common
> > practice is, but to me it seems like removing all the unused macros
> > would
ernel.org; devicet...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: r...@kernel.org; mark.rutl...@arm.com; shawn...@kernel.org; linux-
> arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; computersforpe...@gmail.com; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] spi: spi-mem: Add driver for NXP FlexSPI
> contr
ernel.org; devicet...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: r...@kernel.org; mark.rutl...@arm.com; shawn...@kernel.org; linux-
> arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; computersforpe...@gmail.com; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] spi: spi-mem: Add driver for NXP FlexSPI
> contr
Hi Yogesh,
I have some remarks about your general approach that came to me when
looking at the FSPI driver with the things at the back of my mind, that
I've learned from working at the FSL QSPI driver.
On 17.09.2018 11:48, Yogesh Gaur wrote:
- Add a driver for NXP FlexSPI host controller
Hi Yogesh,
I have some remarks about your general approach that came to me when
looking at the FSPI driver with the things at the back of my mind, that
I've learned from working at the FSL QSPI driver.
On 17.09.2018 11:48, Yogesh Gaur wrote:
- Add a driver for NXP FlexSPI host controller
Hi Boris, Yogesh,
On 17.09.2018 13:37, Boris Brezillon wrote:
Hi Yogesh,
On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 15:18:26 +0530
Yogesh Gaur wrote:
+
+ /*
+* R/W functions for big- or little-endian registers:
+* The FSPI controller's endianness is independent of
+* the CPU core's
Hi Boris, Yogesh,
On 17.09.2018 13:37, Boris Brezillon wrote:
Hi Yogesh,
On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 15:18:26 +0530
Yogesh Gaur wrote:
+
+ /*
+* R/W functions for big- or little-endian registers:
+* The FSPI controller's endianness is independent of
+* the CPU core's
r.kernel.org; devicet...@vger.kernel.org; r...@kernel.org;
> mark.rutl...@arm.com; shawn...@kernel.org; linux-arm-
> ker...@lists.infradead.org; computersforpe...@gmail.com; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] spi: spi-mem: Add driver for NXP FlexSPI
&
r.kernel.org; devicet...@vger.kernel.org; r...@kernel.org;
> mark.rutl...@arm.com; shawn...@kernel.org; linux-arm-
> ker...@lists.infradead.org; computersforpe...@gmail.com; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] spi: spi-mem: Add driver for NXP FlexSPI
&
Hi Yogesh,
On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 15:18:26 +0530
Yogesh Gaur wrote:
> +
> + /*
> + * R/W functions for big- or little-endian registers:
> + * The FSPI controller's endianness is independent of
> + * the CPU core's endianness. So far, although the CPU
> + * core is
Hi Yogesh,
On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 15:18:26 +0530
Yogesh Gaur wrote:
> +
> + /*
> + * R/W functions for big- or little-endian registers:
> + * The FSPI controller's endianness is independent of
> + * the CPU core's endianness. So far, although the CPU
> + * core is
14 matches
Mail list logo
