RE: [PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: nand: Update dependency of IFC for LS1021A

2017-02-12 Thread Alison Wang
Hi, Boris, > On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 02:02:30 + > Alison Wang wrote: > > > > On 01/04/2017 02:46 AM, Alison Wang wrote: > > > >> On 01/03/2017 03:41 AM, Alison Wang wrote: > > > >>> As NAND support for Freescale/NXP IFC controller is available > on > > > >>> LS1021A, the

RE: [PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: nand: Update dependency of IFC for LS1021A

2017-02-12 Thread Alison Wang
Hi, Boris, > On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 02:02:30 + > Alison Wang wrote: > > > > On 01/04/2017 02:46 AM, Alison Wang wrote: > > > >> On 01/03/2017 03:41 AM, Alison Wang wrote: > > > >>> As NAND support for Freescale/NXP IFC controller is available > on > > > >>> LS1021A, the dependency for LS1021A

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: nand: Update dependency of IFC for LS1021A

2017-02-06 Thread Boris Brezillon
Hi Alison, On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 02:02:30 + Alison Wang wrote: > > On 01/04/2017 02:46 AM, Alison Wang wrote: > > >> On 01/03/2017 03:41 AM, Alison Wang wrote: > > >>> As NAND support for Freescale/NXP IFC controller is available on > > >>> LS1021A, the dependency for

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: nand: Update dependency of IFC for LS1021A

2017-02-06 Thread Boris Brezillon
Hi Alison, On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 02:02:30 + Alison Wang wrote: > > On 01/04/2017 02:46 AM, Alison Wang wrote: > > >> On 01/03/2017 03:41 AM, Alison Wang wrote: > > >>> As NAND support for Freescale/NXP IFC controller is available on > > >>> LS1021A, the dependency for LS1021A is added. >

RE: [PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: nand: Update dependency of IFC for LS1021A

2017-01-04 Thread Alison Wang
> On 01/04/2017 02:46 AM, Alison Wang wrote: > >> On 01/03/2017 03:41 AM, Alison Wang wrote: > >>> As NAND support for Freescale/NXP IFC controller is available on > >>> LS1021A, the dependency for LS1021A is added. > >> > >> Does LS stand for LayerScape ? Yes it does. So why does > >>

RE: [PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: nand: Update dependency of IFC for LS1021A

2017-01-04 Thread Alison Wang
> On 01/04/2017 02:46 AM, Alison Wang wrote: > >> On 01/03/2017 03:41 AM, Alison Wang wrote: > >>> As NAND support for Freescale/NXP IFC controller is available on > >>> LS1021A, the dependency for LS1021A is added. > >> > >> Does LS stand for LayerScape ? Yes it does. So why does > >>

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: nand: Update dependency of IFC for LS1021A

2017-01-03 Thread Marek Vasut
On 01/04/2017 02:46 AM, Alison Wang wrote: >> On 01/03/2017 03:41 AM, Alison Wang wrote: >>> As NAND support for Freescale/NXP IFC controller is available on >>> LS1021A, the dependency for LS1021A is added. >> >> Does LS stand for LayerScape ? Yes it does. So why does ARCH_LAYERSCAPE >> not cover

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: nand: Update dependency of IFC for LS1021A

2017-01-03 Thread Marek Vasut
On 01/04/2017 02:46 AM, Alison Wang wrote: >> On 01/03/2017 03:41 AM, Alison Wang wrote: >>> As NAND support for Freescale/NXP IFC controller is available on >>> LS1021A, the dependency for LS1021A is added. >> >> Does LS stand for LayerScape ? Yes it does. So why does ARCH_LAYERSCAPE >> not cover

RE: [PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: nand: Update dependency of IFC for LS1021A

2017-01-03 Thread Alison Wang
> On 01/03/2017 03:41 AM, Alison Wang wrote: > > As NAND support for Freescale/NXP IFC controller is available on > > LS1021A, the dependency for LS1021A is added. > > Does LS stand for LayerScape ? Yes it does. So why does ARCH_LAYERSCAPE > not cover LS1021 ? [Alison Wang] LS1021A is an earlier

RE: [PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: nand: Update dependency of IFC for LS1021A

2017-01-03 Thread Alison Wang
> On 01/03/2017 03:41 AM, Alison Wang wrote: > > As NAND support for Freescale/NXP IFC controller is available on > > LS1021A, the dependency for LS1021A is added. > > Does LS stand for LayerScape ? Yes it does. So why does ARCH_LAYERSCAPE > not cover LS1021 ? [Alison Wang] LS1021A is an earlier

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: nand: Update dependency of IFC for LS1021A

2017-01-03 Thread Marek Vasut
On 01/03/2017 03:41 AM, Alison Wang wrote: > As NAND support for Freescale/NXP IFC controller is available on > LS1021A, the dependency for LS1021A is added. Does LS stand for LayerScape ? Yes it does. So why does ARCH_LAYERSCAPE not cover LS1021 ? > Signed-off-by: Alison Wang

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: nand: Update dependency of IFC for LS1021A

2017-01-03 Thread Marek Vasut
On 01/03/2017 03:41 AM, Alison Wang wrote: > As NAND support for Freescale/NXP IFC controller is available on > LS1021A, the dependency for LS1021A is added. Does LS stand for LayerScape ? Yes it does. So why does ARCH_LAYERSCAPE not cover LS1021 ? > Signed-off-by: Alison Wang > --- > Changes