On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 13:37:53 +
Vitor Soares wrote:
> From: Boris Brezillon
> Date: Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 12:37:27
>
> > On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:16:34 +
> > Vitor Soares wrote:
> >
> > > From: Boris Brezillon
> > > Date: Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 07:15:33
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 11 Jun 20
From: Boris Brezillon
Date: Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 12:37:27
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:16:34 +
> Vitor Soares wrote:
>
> > From: Boris Brezillon
> > Date: Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 07:15:33
> >
> > > On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 16:06:43 +0200
> > > Vitor Soares wrote:
> > >
> > > > Currently the I3C f
On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:16:34 +
Vitor Soares wrote:
> From: Boris Brezillon
> Date: Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 07:15:33
>
> > On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 16:06:43 +0200
> > Vitor Soares wrote:
> >
> > > Currently the I3C framework limits SCL frequency to FM speed when
> > > dealing with a mixed slow b
From: Boris Brezillon
Date: Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 07:15:33
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 16:06:43 +0200
> Vitor Soares wrote:
>
> > Currently the I3C framework limits SCL frequency to FM speed when
> > dealing with a mixed slow bus, even if all I2C devices are FM+ capable.
> >
> > The core was also not
On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 16:06:43 +0200
Vitor Soares wrote:
> Currently the I3C framework limits SCL frequency to FM speed when
> dealing with a mixed slow bus, even if all I2C devices are FM+ capable.
>
> The core was also not accounting for I3C speed limitations when
> operating in mixed slow mode
5 matches
Mail list logo