> -Original Message-
> From: linux-edac-ow...@vger.kernel.org On
> Behalf Of Borislav Petkov
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2019 6:09 PM
> To: Luck, Tony
> Cc: Ghannam, Yazen ; linux-e...@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; x...@kernel.org
> Subject: Re
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 01:42:40PM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:29:02PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >
> > Can we do instead:
> >
> > -static DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(struct mce_bank *, mce_banks_array);
> > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(struct mce_bank,
> >
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:29:02PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> Can we do instead:
>
> -static DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(struct mce_bank *, mce_banks_array);
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(struct mce_bank,
> mce_banks_array[MAX_NR_BANKS]);
>
> which should be something like 9*32 =
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 05:52:42PM +, Ghannam, Yazen wrote:
> This message comes from ___might_sleep() which checks the
> system_state.
>
> On CPU0, system_state=SYSTEM_BOOTING.
>
> On every other CPU, system_state=SYSTEM_SCHEDULING, and that's the
> only system_state where the message is
> -Original Message-
> From: Borislav Petkov
> Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2019 6:26 AM
> To: Ghannam, Yazen
> Cc: linux-e...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; b...@suse.de;
> tony.l...@intel.com; x...@kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] x86/MCE: Mak
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 08:32:20PM +, Ghannam, Yazen wrote:
> From: Yazen Ghannam
>
> The number of MCA banks is provided per logical CPU. Historically, this
> number has been the same across all CPUs, but this is not an
> architectural guarantee. Future AMD systems may have MCA bank counts
6 matches
Mail list logo
