l.org
> Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org; devicet...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] can: xilinx CAN controller support.
>
> On 02/28/2014 02:07 PM, Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao wrote:
> >>>> What hap
grant.lik...@linaro.org; robh...@kernel.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-
>> ker...@vger.kernel.org; devicet...@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] can: xilinx CAN controller support.
>>
>>
On 02/28/2014 02:07 PM, Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao wrote:
What happens if the interrupt handler is delayed? For example in a RT
enabled system the interrupt handler runs as a thread. There might be
other threads with higher priority. The hardware will probably send
all CAN fra
l.org
> Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org; devicet...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] can: xilinx CAN controller support.
>
> On 02/28/2014 01:44 PM, Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao wrote:
> > Hi Marc,
> >
>
r.com; Michal Simek;
>> grant.lik...@linaro.org; robh...@kernel.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-
>> ker...@vger.kernel.org; devicet...@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] can: xilinx CAN contr
l.org
> Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org; devicet...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] can: xilinx CAN controller support.
>
> On 02/28/2014 06:50 AM, Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao wrote:
> > Hi Marc,
> >
>
r.com; Michal Simek;
>> grant.lik...@linaro.org; robh...@kernel.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-
>> ker...@vger.kernel.org; devicet...@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] can: xilinx CAN contr
l.org
> Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org; devicet...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] can: xilinx CAN controller support.
>
> On 02/26/2014 03:46 PM, Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao wrote:
> > Hi Marc
r.com; Michal Simek;
>> grant.lik...@linaro.org; robh...@kernel.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-
>> ker...@vger.kernel.org; devicet...@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] can: xilinx CAN contr
l.org
> Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org; devicet...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] can: xilinx CAN controller support.
>
> On 02/26/2014 02:07 PM, Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao wrote:
> >> This loop loo
On 02/26/2014 02:07 PM, Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao wrote:
>> This loop looks broken. Can you explain how it works.
>>
>> What it shoud do is:
>> We have put (priv->tx_head - priv->tx_tail) CAN frames into the FIFO.
>> This means at maximum there could be this amount of CAN frames which
>> have be
On 02/24/2014 05:25 AM, Kedareswara rao Appana wrote:
> This patch adds xilinx CAN controller support.
> This driver supports both ZYNQ CANPS and Soft IP
> AXI CAN controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kedareswara rao Appana
Looks quite good. Just the tx_complete routine is a bit fishy. Comments
inline
12 matches
Mail list logo