Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Touchscreen performance related fixes

2014-12-16 Thread Richard Cochran
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:31:47AM +0200, Catalin Crenguta wrote: > > It seems that because the ribbon cable has both the analog and digital > signals, the analog signals are affected by the digital ones (hence > the touchscreen was working OK when the display was disabled). Putting > decoupling c

Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Touchscreen performance related fixes

2014-12-16 Thread Catalin Crenguta
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Griffis, Brad wrote: > How are you configuring ti,charge-delay in your dts? I've seen this behavior > on some custom boards where we were using a smaller charge delay (0x400) to > begin with, and by upping it to 0xb000 we resolved the issue. These patches > ho

Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Touchscreen performance related fixes

2014-12-15 Thread Catalin Crenguta
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Griffis, Brad wrote: > How are you configuring ti,charge-delay in your dts? I've seen this behavior > on some custom boards where we were using a smaller charge delay (0x400) to > begin with, and by upping it to 0xb000 we resolved the issue. These patches > ho

Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Touchscreen performance related fixes

2014-12-14 Thread Catalin Crenguta
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Griffis, Brad wrote: > How are you configuring ti,charge-delay in your dts? I've seen this behavior > on some custom boards where we were using a smaller charge delay (0x400) to > begin with, and by upping it to 0xb000 we resolved the issue. These patches > h

RE: [PATCH v4 0/6] Touchscreen performance related fixes

2014-12-12 Thread Griffis, Brad
> -Original Message- > From: Catalin Crenguta [mailto:catalin.creng...@gmail.com] > I have tried your patches by cloning [1] and copying the relevant files over > the kernel I've cloned from [2]. > It compiles & runs, but I'm seeing lots of pen-down/pen-up events when I'm > not touching the

Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Touchscreen performance related fixes

2014-12-12 Thread Catalin Crenguta
Hello, I have tried your patches by cloning [1] and copying the relevant files over the kernel I've cloned from [2]. It compiles & runs, but I'm seeing lots of pen-down/pen-up events when I'm not touching the screen. Any suggestions? Hardware: Beaglebone Black with BB-View 4.3 Cape from Farnell

Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Touchscreen performance related fixes

2014-12-12 Thread Vignesh R
On Friday 12 December 2014 02:10 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 12/11/2014 09:34 PM, Nicolae Rosia wrote: >> Hello, > > Hi, > >> Any updates on this series? I don't see it applied in [1] or [2]. > > I manage to freeze am335x-evm with those patches and I think Vignesh > is looking in

Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Touchscreen performance related fixes

2014-12-11 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 12/11/2014 09:34 PM, Nicolae Rosia wrote: > Hello, Hi, > Any updates on this series? I don't see it applied in [1] or [2]. I manage to freeze am335x-evm with those patches and I think Vignesh is looking into this. > Regards, > Nicolae Rosia Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send

Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Touchscreen performance related fixes

2014-12-11 Thread Nicolae Rosia
Hello, Any updates on this series? I don't see it applied in [1] or [2]. [1] https://github.com/RobertCNelson/ti-linux-kernel/commits/ti-linux-3.14.y/drivers/input/touchscreen/ti_am335x_tsc.c [2] https://github.com/RobertCNelson/ti-linux-kernel/commits/ti-linux-3.14.y-exp/drivers/input/touchscr

Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Touchscreen performance related fixes

2014-12-01 Thread Vignesh R
Hi, On Monday 01 December 2014 03:29 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 12/01/2014 10:53 AM, Vignesh R wrote: >> Hi Sebastian, > > Hi Vignesh, > >> I fixed the issue that was triggering the WARN_ON(). I think it would be >> better if you tested these patches, before I posted them on the

Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Touchscreen performance related fixes

2014-12-01 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 12/01/2014 10:53 AM, Vignesh R wrote: > Hi Sebastian, Hi Vignesh, > I fixed the issue that was triggering the WARN_ON(). I think it would be > better if you tested these patches, before I posted them on the > mainline. I don't want to clutter the list with too main versions. Here > is the link

Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Touchscreen performance related fixes

2014-12-01 Thread Vignesh R
Hi Sebastian, On Monday 24 November 2014 05:21 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > * Vignesh R | 2014-11-14 10:37:25 [+0530]: > >> This series of patches fix TSC defects related to lag in touchscreen >> performance and cursor jump at touch release. The lag was result of >> udelay in TSC interr

Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Touchscreen performance related fixes

2014-11-26 Thread Vignesh R
On Monday 24 November 2014 06:05 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 11/24/2014 01:16 PM, Vignesh R wrote: > >> I have tried running both IIO and TSC at the same time. But I have never >> seen WARN_ON() even after running for close to 30 min. Can you send me >> the exact script, so that it

Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Touchscreen performance related fixes

2014-11-24 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 11/24/2014 01:16 PM, Vignesh R wrote: > I have tried running both IIO and TSC at the same time. But I have never > seen WARN_ON() even after running for close to 30 min. Can you send me > the exact script, so that it will be easy to reproduce? Sure thing. - one shell evtest /dev/input/

Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Touchscreen performance related fixes

2014-11-24 Thread Vignesh R
On Monday 24 November 2014 05:21 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > * Vignesh R | 2014-11-14 10:37:25 [+0530]: > >> This series of patches fix TSC defects related to lag in touchscreen >> performance and cursor jump at touch release. The lag was result of >> udelay in TSC interrupt handler.

Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Touchscreen performance related fixes

2014-11-24 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Vignesh R | 2014-11-14 10:37:25 [+0530]: >This series of patches fix TSC defects related to lag in touchscreen >performance and cursor jump at touch release. The lag was result of >udelay in TSC interrupt handler. Cursor jump due to false pen-up event. >The patches implement Advisory 1.0.31 in s