Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] cpufreq: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks

2016-02-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Doug Smythies wrote: > On 2016.02.12 05:39 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Doug Smythies wrote: >>> On 2016.02.11 14:50 Doug Smythies wrote: On 2016.02.10 22:03 Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > On Wednesday, February 10, 2016 03:1

RE: [PATCH v6 0/3] cpufreq: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks

2016-02-12 Thread Doug Smythies
On 2016.02.12 05:39 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Doug Smythies wrote: >> On 2016.02.11 14:50 Doug Smythies wrote: >>> On 2016.02.10 22:03 Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: On Wednesday, February 10, 2016 03:11:43 PM Doug Smythies wrote: >> > My test computer has an

Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] cpufreq: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks

2016-02-12 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Doug Smythies wrote: > On 2016.02.11 14:50 Doug Smythies wrote: >> On 2016.02.10 22:03 Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: >>> On Wednesday, February 10, 2016 03:11:43 PM Doug Smythies wrote: > My test computer has an older model i7 (Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ >

RE: [PATCH v6 0/3] cpufreq: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks

2016-02-11 Thread Doug Smythies
On 2016.02.11 14:50 Doug Smythies wrote: > On 2016.02.10 22:03 Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: >> On Wednesday, February 10, 2016 03:11:43 PM Doug Smythies wrote: >>> My test computer has an older model i7 (Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ >>> 3.40GHz) >> Thanks Doug. If you have specific workloads, p

Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] cpufreq: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks

2016-02-11 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 2:02 AM, Doug Smythies wrote: > On 2016.02.11 15:28 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On 2106.02.11 14:50 Doug Smythies wrote: > >>> What I do have from my 2 hour idle tests is the of total number of passes >>> through >>> the intel_pstate driver: >>> >>> Control sample: Kernel

RE: [PATCH v6 0/3] cpufreq: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks

2016-02-11 Thread Doug Smythies
On 2016.02.11 15:28 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On 2106.02.11 14:50 Doug Smythies wrote: >> What I do have from my 2 hour idle tests is the of total number of passes >> through >> the intel_pstate driver: >> >> Control sample: Kernel 4.3-rc3: 37949 passes. >> Kernel 4.3-rc3 + rjw 3 patch set v5: 1

Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] cpufreq: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks

2016-02-11 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi Doug, On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:50 PM, Doug Smythies wrote: > On 2016.02.10 15:18 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Wednesday, February 10, 2016 03:11:43 PM Doug Smythies wrote: >>> On 2016.02.10 07:17 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Friday, January 29, 2016 11:52:15 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

RE: [PATCH v6 0/3] cpufreq: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks

2016-02-11 Thread Doug Smythies
On 2016.02.10 15:18 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, February 10, 2016 03:11:43 PM Doug Smythies wrote: >> On 2016.02.10 07:17 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Friday, January 29, 2016 11:52:15 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> This patch set solves a long standing issue with the intel_ps

Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] cpufreq: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks

2016-02-10 Thread Srinivas Pandruvada
On 02/10/2016 03:11 PM, Doug Smythies wrote: On 2016.02.10 07:17 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Friday, January 29, 2016 11:52:15 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: The following patch series introduces a mechanism allowing the cpufreq core and "setpolicy" drivers to provide utilization update callback

Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] cpufreq: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks

2016-02-10 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, February 10, 2016 03:11:43 PM Doug Smythies wrote: > On 2016.02.10 07:17 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Friday, January 29, 2016 11:52:15 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> > >> The following patch series introduces a mechanism allowing the cpufreq core > >> and "setpolicy" drivers to

RE: [PATCH v6 0/3] cpufreq: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks

2016-02-10 Thread Doug Smythies
On 2016.02.10 07:17 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, January 29, 2016 11:52:15 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> >> The following patch series introduces a mechanism allowing the cpufreq core >> and "setpolicy" drivers to provide utilization update callbacks to be invoked >> by the scheduler on u