> Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/3] regmap: Add the DT binding documentation for
> endianness
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 07:46:34AM +0100, Xiubo Li wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li
> > ---
> > .../bindings/regmap/regmap-endianness.txt | 48
> +
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 07:46:34AM +0100, Xiubo Li wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li
> ---
> .../bindings/regmap/regmap-endianness.txt | 48
> ++
> 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regmap/regmap-endianness.txt
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Brown [mailto:broo...@kernel.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 5:10 AM
> To: Xiubo Li-B47053
> Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/3] regmap: Add the DT binding documentation for
&g
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 07:04:00AM +, li.xi...@freescale.com wrote:
> > Generally just not
> > mentioning regmap is better for a binding definition, the binding should
> > be usable by all OSs and not just Linux.
> How about move the endianness OF parsing to the driver/of/ ?
> Is this will be
> Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/3] regmap: Add the DT binding documentation for
> endianness
>
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 06:09:08PM +0800, Xiubo Li wrote:
>
> > +sai2: sai@40031000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,vf610-sai";
&
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 06:09:08PM +0800, Xiubo Li wrote:
> +sai2: sai@40031000 {
> + compatible = "fsl,vf610-sai";
> + reg = <0x40031000 0x1000>;
> + ...
> + val-endian = 'LE';
> +};
This is mostly OK as a binding (though it should be CCed to the DT list
a
6 matches
Mail list logo
