On 2020.05.21 10:16 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
...
>
> The INTEL_CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_DELAY_HWP value has been guessed and it very well
> may turn out to be either too high or too low for the general use, which is
> one
> reason why getting as much testing coverage as possible is key here.
>
> If y
On 2020.05.21 10:16 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> Allow intel_pstate to work in the passive mode with HWP enabled and
> make it translate the target frequency supplied by the cpufreq
> governor in use into an EPP value to be written to the HWP request
> MSR (high frequ
"Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
> to On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 10:57 PM Francisco Jerez
> wrote:
>>
>> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
>>
>> > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 3:39 AM Francisco Jerez
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
>> >>
>> >> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>> >> >
>> >> > Allo
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 5:51 PM Doug Smythies wrote:
>
> On 2020.05.26 01:19 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > to On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 10:57 PM Francisco Jerez
> > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
> > > > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 3:39 AM Francisco Jerez
> > >
> > > Why not HWP_MIN_PERF? That would le
On 2020.05.26 01:19 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> to On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 10:57 PM Francisco Jerez
> > "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
> > > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 3:39 AM Francisco Jerez
> >
> > Why not HWP_MIN_PERF? That would leave the HWP quite some room for
> > maneuvering (the whole HWP_MIN_P
to On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 10:57 PM Francisco Jerez
wrote:
>
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
>
> > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 3:39 AM Francisco Jerez
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
> >>
> >> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> >> >
> >> > Allow intel_pstate to work in the passive mode wi
Hi all,
The INTEL_CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_DELAY_HWP = 2
test results from this e-mail were incorrect.
The test and graphs are being re-done.
On 2020.05.25 08:30 Doug smythies wrote:
>
> Legend - intel_pstate - powersave graph [2].
>
> What? Why is there such a graph, unrelated to this patch?
>
"Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
> On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 3:39 AM Francisco Jerez
> wrote:
>>
>> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
>>
>> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>> >
>> > Allow intel_pstate to work in the passive mode with HWP enabled and
>> > make it translate the target frequency supplied by the cpu
On 2020.05.21 10:16 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> Allow intel_pstate to work in the passive mode with HWP enabled and
> make it translate the target frequency supplied by the cpufreq
> governor in use into an EPP value to be written to the HWP request
> MSR (high freq
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 3:39 AM Francisco Jerez
wrote:
>
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
>
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> >
> > Allow intel_pstate to work in the passive mode with HWP enabled and
> > make it translate the target frequency supplied by the cpufreq
> > governor in use into an EPP valu
"Rafael J. Wysocki" writes:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> Allow intel_pstate to work in the passive mode with HWP enabled and
> make it translate the target frequency supplied by the cpufreq
> governor in use into an EPP value to be written to the HWP request
> MSR (high frequencies are mapped t
11 matches
Mail list logo
