Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v8] cpuidle: New timer events oriented governor for tickless systems

2019-10-10 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 9:05 AM Doug Smythies wrote: > > On 2019.10.09 06:37 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Wednesday, October 9, 2019 1:19:51 AM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> On Tuesday, October 8, 2019 12:49:01 PM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 11:51 AM Rafael J

RE: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v8] cpuidle: New timer events oriented governor for tickless systems

2019-10-10 Thread Doug Smythies
On 2019.10.09 06:37 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, October 9, 2019 1:19:51 AM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Tuesday, October 8, 2019 12:49:01 PM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 11:51 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 8:20 AM Doug Smyth

Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v8] cpuidle: New timer events oriented governor for tickless systems

2019-10-09 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, October 9, 2019 1:19:51 AM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, October 8, 2019 12:49:01 PM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 11:51 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 8:20 AM Doug Smythies wrote: > > > > > > > > On 2019.10.06

Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v8] cpuidle: New timer events oriented governor for tickless systems

2019-10-08 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, October 8, 2019 12:49:01 PM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 11:51 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 8:20 AM Doug Smythies wrote: > > > > > > On 2019.10.06 08:34 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 4:46 PM Doug Smythie

Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v8] cpuidle: New timer events oriented governor for tickless systems

2019-10-08 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 11:51 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 8:20 AM Doug Smythies wrote: > > > > On 2019.10.06 08:34 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 4:46 PM Doug Smythies wrote: > > >> On 2019.10.01 02:32 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > >>> On Sun, Sep

Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v8] cpuidle: New timer events oriented governor for tickless systems

2019-10-08 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 8:20 AM Doug Smythies wrote: > > On 2019.10.06 08:34 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 4:46 PM Doug Smythies wrote: > >> On 2019.10.01 02:32 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >>> On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 6:05 PM Doug Smythies wrote: > On 2019.09.26 09:32 Dou

RE: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v8] cpuidle: New timer events oriented governor for tickless systems

2019-10-07 Thread Doug Smythies
On 2019.10.06 08:34 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 4:46 PM Doug Smythies wrote: >> On 2019.10.01 02:32 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 6:05 PM Doug Smythies wrote: On 2019.09.26 09:32 Doug Smythies wrote: > If the deepest idle state is disable

Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v8] cpuidle: New timer events oriented governor for tickless systems

2019-10-06 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 4:46 PM Doug Smythies wrote: > > On 2019.10.01 02:32 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 6:05 PM Doug Smythies wrote: > >> On 2019.09.26 09:32 Doug Smythies wrote: > >> > >>> If the deepest idle state is disabled, the system > >>> can become somewhat unstab

RE: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v8] cpuidle: New timer events oriented governor for tickless systems

2019-10-06 Thread Doug Smythies
On 2019.10.01 02:32 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 6:05 PM Doug Smythies wrote: >> On 2019.09.26 09:32 Doug Smythies wrote: >> >>> If the deepest idle state is disabled, the system >>> can become somewhat unstable, with anywhere between no problem >>> at all, to the occasional

Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v8] cpuidle: New timer events oriented governor for tickless systems

2019-10-01 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 6:05 PM Doug Smythies wrote: > > On 2019.09.26 09:32 Doug Smythies wrote: > > > If the deepest idle state is disabled, the system > > can become somewhat unstable, with anywhere between no problem > > at all, to the occasional temporary jump using a lot more > > power for a

RE: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v8] cpuidle: New timer events oriented governor for tickless systems

2019-09-29 Thread Doug Smythies
On 2019.09.26 09:32 Doug Smythies wrote: > If the deepest idle state is disabled, the system > can become somewhat unstable, with anywhere between no problem > at all, to the occasional temporary jump using a lot more > power for a few seconds, to a permanent jump using a lot more > power continuo

RE: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v8] cpuidle: New timer events oriented governor for tickless systems

2019-09-26 Thread Doug Smythies
All, Recall the extensive tests and work done between 2018.10.11 and 2019.01.16 on Rafael's teo governor, versions 1 through 11, noting that versions 9, 10, and 11 did not contain functional changes. Hi Rafael, If the deepest idle state is disabled, the system can become somewhat unstable, with

Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v8] cpuidle: New timer events oriented governor for tickless systems

2018-12-17 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 2:53 AM Doug Smythies wrote: > > On 2018.12.11 03:50 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > ...[snip]... > > > With this version of the TEO governor I'm observing slight, but consistent > > performance improvements in some different benchmarks on a few different > > systems with resp

RE: [RFC/RFT][PATCH v8] cpuidle: New timer events oriented governor for tickless systems

2018-12-16 Thread Doug Smythies
On 2018.12.11 03:50 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: ...[snip]... > With this version of the TEO governor I'm observing slight, but consistent > performance improvements in some different benchmarks on a few different > systems with respect to menu Same here. > and the corresponding power draw differen