Michael,
On (09/27/17 15:01), Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Sergey Senozhatsky writes:
>
> > On (09/22/17 16:48), Luck, Tony wrote:
> > [..]
> >> Tested patch series on ia64 successfully.
> >>
> >> Tested-by: Tony Luck
> >
> > thanks!
> >
> >> After this goes upstream, you should submit a patch to
On (09/27/17 16:26), Michael Ellerman wrote:
[..]
> > Tested-by: Santosh Sivaraj
>
> Thanks Santosh.
>
> I also gave it a quick spin. I'll give you an ack for the powerpc changes.
>
> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman (powerpc)
>
>
> Thanks for cleaning this up Sergey.
thanks!
-ss
Santosh Sivaraj writes:
> * Sergey Senozhatsky wrote (on 2017-09-20
> 16:29:02 +):
>
>> Hello
>>
>> RFC
>>
>> On some arches C function pointers are indirect and point to
>> a function descriptor, which contains the actual pointer to the code.
>> This mostly doesn'
Sergey Senozhatsky writes:
> On (09/22/17 16:48), Luck, Tony wrote:
> [..]
>> Tested patch series on ia64 successfully.
>>
>> Tested-by: Tony Luck
>
> thanks!
>
>> After this goes upstream, you should submit a patch to get rid of
>> all uses of %pF (70 instances in 35 files) and %pf (63 in 34)
On 25.09.2017 18:29, Luck, Tony wrote:
speaking of upstream, any objections if this patch set will go through
the printk tree, in one piece?
Fine with me too.
Helge
> speaking of upstream, any objections if this patch set will go through
> the printk tree, in one piece?
Seems to be a better idea than trying to coordinate pulls from three
separate "arch/" trees. Fine with me.
-Tony
On (09/22/17 16:48), Luck, Tony wrote:
[..]
> Tested patch series on ia64 successfully.
>
> Tested-by: Tony Luck
thanks!
> After this goes upstream, you should submit a patch to get rid of
> all uses of %pF (70 instances in 35 files) and %pf (63 in 34)
>
> Perhaps break the patch by top-level
Tested patch series on ia64 successfully.
Tested-by: Tony Luck
After this goes upstream, you should submit a patch to get rid of
all uses of %pF (70 instances in 35 files) and %pf (63 in 34)
Perhaps break the patch by top-level directory (e.g. get all the %pF
and %pF in the 17 files under drive
On (09/22/17 11:04), Santosh Sivaraj wrote:
[..]
> > *** A BIG NOTE ***
> > I don't own ia64/ppc64/parisc64 hardware, so the patches are not
> > tested. Sorry about that!
>
> Tested patch series on ppc64 sucessfully.
>
> You may add tested by to the series.
>
> Tested-by: Santosh
* Sergey Senozhatsky wrote (on 2017-09-20
16:29:02 +):
> Hello
>
> RFC
>
> On some arches C function pointers are indirect and point to
> a function descriptor, which contains the actual pointer to the code.
> This mostly doesn't matter, except for cases when people
On (09/20/17 22:14), Helge Deller wrote:
> On 20.09.2017 18:29, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > This patch set attempts to move ia64/ppc64/parisc64 C function
> > pointer ABI details out of printk() to arch code. Function dereference
> > code now checks if a pointer belongs to a .opd ELF sec
On 20.09.2017 18:29, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
This patch set attempts to move ia64/ppc64/parisc64 C function
pointer ABI details out of printk() to arch code. Function dereference
code now checks if a pointer belongs to a .opd ELF section and dereferences
that pointer only if it does. T
12 matches
Mail list logo