RE: [RFC 00/11] ima: namespace support for IMA policy

2017-05-11 Thread Magalhaes, Guilherme (Brazil R)
I would like to replace part of the email below which briefly presents each one of the patches in this series. This is the right summary: -- Patches 1, 2 and 3 qualify the file pathname considering multiple namespaces. Patch 4 adds the namespace securityfs file which is the interface to define

RE: [RFC 00/11] ima: namespace support for IMA policy

2017-05-11 Thread Magalhaes, Guilherme (Brazil R)
I would like to replace part of the email below which briefly presents each one of the patches in this series. This is the right summary: -- Patches 1, 2 and 3 qualify the file pathname considering multiple namespaces. Patch 4 adds the namespace securityfs file which is the interface to define