On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 09:17:15PM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 07:15:41PM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 07:16:16AM +, Grumbach, Emmanuel wrote:
> > > >
> > > > a) just remove the print and use instead request_module_nowait() (this
>
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 07:15:41PM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 07:16:16AM +, Grumbach, Emmanuel wrote:
> > >
> > > a) just remove the print and use instead request_module_nowait() (this is
> > > more in alignment of what your code actually does today; or
> > >
>
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 07:16:16AM +, Grumbach, Emmanuel wrote:
> >
> > a) just remove the print and use instead request_module_nowait() (this is
> > more in alignment of what your code actually does today; or
> >
> > b) fix the request_module() use so that the error print matches the
> > exp
>
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 09:47:59AM +, Grumbach, Emmanuel wrote:
> > >
> > > The return value of request_module() being 0 does not mean that the
> > > driver which was requested has loaded. To properly check that the
> > > driver was loaded each driver can use internal mechanisms to vet the
On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 09:47:59AM +, Grumbach, Emmanuel wrote:
> >
> > The return value of request_module() being 0 does not mean that the driver
> > which was requested has loaded. To properly check that the driver was
> > loaded each driver can use internal mechanisms to vet the driver is n
>
> The return value of request_module() being 0 does not mean that the driver
> which was requested has loaded. To properly check that the driver was
> loaded each driver can use internal mechanisms to vet the driver is now
> present. The helper try_then_request_module() was added to help with
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
