RE: [RFC PATCH 0/5] New fallback workflow for heterogeneous memory system

2019-04-25 Thread Du, Fan
@kvack.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] New fallback workflow for heterogeneous >memory system > >On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 1:05 AM Du, Fan wrote: >> >> >> >> >-Original Message- >> >From: owner-linux...@kvack.org

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] New fallback workflow for heterogeneous memory system

2019-04-25 Thread Dan Williams
;Cc: a...@linux-foundation.org; Wu, Fengguang ; > >Williams, Dan J ; Hansen, Dave > >; xishi.qiuxi...@alibaba-inc.com; Huang, Ying > >; linux...@kvack.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > >Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] New fallback workflow for heterogeneous > >memory system &g

RE: [RFC PATCH 0/5] New fallback workflow for heterogeneous memory system

2019-04-25 Thread Du, Fan
.@alibaba-inc.com; Huang, Ying >; linux...@kvack.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] New fallback workflow for heterogeneous >memory system > >On Thu 25-04-19 07:41:40, Du, Fan wrote: >> >> >> >-Original Message- >> >Fr

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] New fallback workflow for heterogeneous memory system

2019-04-25 Thread Michal Hocko
; Hansen, Dave > >; xishi.qiuxi...@alibaba-inc.com; Huang, Ying > >; linux...@kvack.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > >Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] New fallback workflow for heterogeneous > >memory system > > > >On Thu 25-04-19 09:21:30, Fan Du wrote: >

RE: [RFC PATCH 0/5] New fallback workflow for heterogeneous memory system

2019-04-25 Thread Du, Fan
@kvack.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] New fallback workflow for heterogeneous >memory system > >On Thu 25-04-19 09:21:30, Fan Du wrote: >[...] >> However PMEM has different characteristics from DRAM, >> the more reasonable or desirable fal

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] New fallback workflow for heterogeneous memory system

2019-04-24 Thread Michal Hocko
On Thu 25-04-19 09:21:30, Fan Du wrote: [...] > However PMEM has different characteristics from DRAM, > the more reasonable or desirable fallback style would be: > DRAM node 0 -> DRAM node 1 -> PMEM node 2 -> PMEM node 3. > When DRAM is exhausted, try PMEM then. Why and who does care? NUMA is fun