RE: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched/topology: Get rid of NUMA overlapping groups

On 09/02/21 00:12, Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Valentin Schneider [mailto:valentin.schnei...@arm.com] >> >> Yes; let's take your topology for instance: >> >> node 0 1 2 3 >> 0: 10 12 20 22 >> 1: 12 10 22 24 >> 2: 20 22 10 1

RE: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched/topology: Get rid of NUMA overlapping groups

pet...@infradead.org; dietmar.eggem...@arm.com; morten.rasmus...@arm.com; > linux...@openeuler.org; xuwei (O) ; Liguozhu (Kenneth) > ; tiantao (H) ; wanghuiqiang > ; Zengtao (B) ; Jonathan > Cameron ; guodong...@linaro.org; Meelis Roos > > Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched/topology

RE: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched/topology: Get rid of NUMA overlapping groups

Hi Barry, On 08/02/21 10:04, Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Valentin Schneider [mailto:valentin.schnei...@arm.com] > > Hi Valentin, > > While I like your approach, this will require more time > to evaluate possible influence as the approach also affects >

RE: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched/topology: Get rid of NUMA overlapping groups

> -Original Message- > From: Valentin Schneider [mailto:valentin.schnei...@arm.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2021 4:55 AM > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Cc: vincent.guit...@linaro.org; mgor...@suse.de; mi...@kernel.org; > pet...@infradead.org; dietmar.eggem...@arm.com; morten.