On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 06:59:35AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Leon Romanovsky
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2021 1:53 PM
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 01:17:11PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 1/7/21 3:16 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 06:55
> From: Leon Romanovsky
> Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2021 1:53 PM
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 01:17:11PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 1/7/21 3:16 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 06:55:16AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > > > > From: Leon Romanovsky
> > > > > S
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 01:17:11PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 1/7/21 3:16 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 06:55:16AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > > > From: Leon Romanovsky
> > > > Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2021 2:09 PM
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 02:04
Hi,
On 1/7/21 3:16 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 06:55:16AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
From: Leon Romanovsky
Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2021 2:09 PM
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 02:04:29AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
From: Leon Romanovsky
Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2021 12:02 A
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 06:55:16AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Leon Romanovsky
> > Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2021 2:09 PM
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 02:04:29AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > > > From: Leon Romanovsky
> > > > Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2021 12:02 AM
> > > >
> > > > On
> From: Leon Romanovsky
> Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2021 2:09 PM
>
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 02:04:29AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > > From: Leon Romanovsky
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2021 12:02 AM
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 11:23:39AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > > On We
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 02:04:29AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Leon Romanovsky
> > Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2021 12:02 AM
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 11:23:39AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 12:40:17PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > >
> > > > I asked
> From: Leon Romanovsky
> Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2021 12:02 AM
>
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 11:23:39AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 12:40:17PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >
> > > I asked what will you do when QEMU will gain needed functionality?
> > > Will you
On 1/7/21 12:01 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 11:23:39AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 12:40:17PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
I asked what will you do when QEMU will gain needed functionality?
Will you remove QEMU from this list? If yes, how such
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 11:23:39AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 12:40:17PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>
> > I asked what will you do when QEMU will gain needed functionality?
> > Will you remove QEMU from this list? If yes, how such "new" kernel will
> > work on old QE
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 12:40:17PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> I asked what will you do when QEMU will gain needed functionality?
> Will you remove QEMU from this list? If yes, how such "new" kernel will
> work on old QEMU versions?
The needed functionality is some VMM hypercall, so presumabl
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 06:10:09PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Hi Leon,
>
> On 2021/1/6 14:06, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 10:27:49AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> > > The pci_subdevice_msi_create_irq_domain() should fail if the underlying
> > > platform is not able to support IMS (I
Hi Leon,
On 2021/1/6 14:06, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 10:27:49AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
The pci_subdevice_msi_create_irq_domain() should fail if the underlying
platform is not able to support IMS (Interrupt Message Storage). Otherwise,
the isolation of interrupt is not guar
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 10:27:49AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> The pci_subdevice_msi_create_irq_domain() should fail if the underlying
> platform is not able to support IMS (Interrupt Message Storage). Otherwise,
> the isolation of interrupt is not guaranteed.
>
> For x86, IMS is only supported on bar
14 matches
Mail list logo