On Fri, Feb 19 2021 at 00:35 -0800, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 11/02/21 9:18 pm, Asutosh Das wrote:
During runtime-suspend of ufs host, the scsi devices are
already suspended and so are the queues associated with them.
But the ufs host sends SSU to wlun during its runtime-suspend.
During the
On 11/02/21 9:18 pm, Asutosh Das wrote:
> During runtime-suspend of ufs host, the scsi devices are
> already suspended and so are the queues associated with them.
> But the ufs host sends SSU to wlun during its runtime-suspend.
> During the process blk_queue_enter checks if the queue is not in
>
On Tue, Feb 16 2021 at 09:44 -0800, Asutosh Das wrote:
On Sat, Feb 13 2021 at 13:37 -0800, Avri Altman wrote:
+ } else {
Is it possible to get here?
Scsi_scan_host is called only after successful add_wluns
It looks so.
scsi 0:0:0:49488: Link setup for lun - ufshcd_setup_links
[...]
On Fri, Feb 12 2021 at 19:25 -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 2/11/21 11:18 AM, Asutosh Das wrote:
+static inline bool is_rpmb_wlun(struct scsi_device *sdev)
+{
+ return (sdev->lun == ufshcd_upiu_wlun_to_scsi_wlun(UFS_UPIU_RPMB_WLUN));
+}
+
+static inline bool is_device_wlun(struct
On Sat, Feb 13 2021 at 13:37 -0800, Avri Altman wrote:
+ } else {
Is it possible to get here?
Scsi_scan_host is called only after successful add_wluns
It looks so.
scsi 0:0:0:49488: Link setup for lun - ufshcd_setup_links
[...]
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1d4
show_stack+0x18/0x24
> + } else {
Is it possible to get here?
Scsi_scan_host is called only after successful add_wluns
> + /* device wlun is probed */
> + hba->luns_avail--;
> + }
> +}
> +
>
> /**
> @@ -7254,6 +7312,14 @@ static int ufshcd_scsi_add_wlus(struct ufs_hba
>
On 2/11/21 11:18 AM, Asutosh Das wrote:
> +static inline bool is_rpmb_wlun(struct scsi_device *sdev)
> +{
> + return (sdev->lun == ufshcd_upiu_wlun_to_scsi_wlun(UFS_UPIU_RPMB_WLUN));
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool is_device_wlun(struct scsi_device *sdev)
> +{
> + return (sdev->lun ==
> +
7 matches
Mail list logo
