> -Original Message-
> From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2014 17:58
> To: Winkler, Tomas
> Cc: a...@arndb.de; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [char-misc-next V3] mei: add reference counting for me clients
&
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 08:40:21AM +, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 05:22:51AM +, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 10:42:05AM +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> > > > > To support dynamic addition/remove we add reference
> > > > > counter.
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 05:22:51AM +, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 10:42:05AM +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> > > > To support dynamic addition/remove we add reference
> > > > counter.
> > >
> > > What is keeping two different threads / cpus from grabbing a refer
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 05:22:51AM +, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 10:42:05AM +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> > > To support dynamic addition/remove we add reference
> > > counter.
> >
> > What is keeping two different threads / cpus from grabbing a reference
> > at the
>
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 10:42:05AM +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> > To support dynamic addition/remove we add reference
> > counter.
>
> What is keeping two different threads / cpus from grabbing a reference
> at the same time the other one is dropping it?
>
> You have a list here, with no lo
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 10:42:05AM +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> To support dynamic addition/remove we add reference
> counter.
What is keeping two different threads / cpus from grabbing a reference
at the same time the other one is dropping it?
You have a list here, with no locking, right? You
6 matches
Mail list logo