* Dor Laor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Afterwards we'll need to compensate the lost alarm signals to the
> guests by using one of
> - hrtimers to inject the lost interrupts for specific guests. The
> problem this will increase the overall load.
> - Injecting several virtual irq to the guests
On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 15:25 -0800, Dor Laor wrote:
> This is great news for PV guests.
>
> Never-the-less we still need to improve our full virtualized guest
> support.
Full virtualized guests, which have their own dyntick support, are fine
as long as we provide local apic emulation for them.
I
>* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > dyntick-enabled guest:
>> > - reduce the load on the host when the guest is idling
>> > (currently an idle guest consumes a few percent cpu)
>>
>> yeah. KVM under -rt already works with dynticks enabled on both the
>> host and the guest. (but it's
3 matches
Mail list logo
