RE: [patch 1/1] Hot plug CPU to support physical add of new processors (i386)

2005-09-01 Thread Protasevich, Natalie
ernel@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] Hot plug CPU to support physical add > of new processors (i386) > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 04:09:09PM -0500, Protasevich, Natalie wrote: > > > > > > > Current IA32 CPU hotplug code doesn't allo

Re: [patch 1/1] Hot plug CPU to support physical add of new processors (i386)

2005-09-01 Thread Ashok Raj
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 04:09:09PM -0500, Protasevich, Natalie wrote: > > > > > Current IA32 CPU hotplug code doesn't allow bringing up > > processors that were not present in the boot configuration. > > > To make existing hot plug facility more practical for physical hot > > > plug, possible p

RE: [patch 1/1] Hot plug CPU to support physical add of new processors (i386)

2005-09-01 Thread Protasevich, Natalie
> Hi Natalie, > > sorry for the late catchup... > > Just to make sure we use the cpu maps properly here is the > current definition iam not sure if you are breaking any of > these assumptions, cause if you do you will break existing > implementations... so pardon for the verbosity. > > cpu_p

Re: [patch 1/1] Hot plug CPU to support physical add of new processors (i386)

2005-09-01 Thread Ashok Raj
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 10:45:10AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > Hallo Natalie, > > On Wednesday 31 August 2005 14:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Current IA32 CPU hotplug code doesn't allow bringing up processors that > > were not present in the boot configuration. To make existing hot plug > > fac

Re: [patch 1/1] Hot plug CPU to support physical add of new processors (i386)

2005-09-01 Thread Ashok Raj
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 05:13:10AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Natalie, sorry for the late catchup... Just to make sure we use the cpu maps properly here is the current definition iam not sure if you are breaking any of these assumptions, cause if you do you will break existing implement

RE: Re: [patch 1/1] Hot plug CPU to support physical add of new processors (i386)

2005-09-01 Thread Protasevich, Natalie
> We should probably also not to try to boot disabled cpus in > smp_boot_cpus()... > > --Mika > Good point, probably by not setting phys_cpu_present_map for those in MP_processor_info()... Thanks, --Natalie > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the bod

RE: [patch 1/1] Hot plug CPU to support physical add of new processors (i386)

2005-09-01 Thread Protasevich, Natalie
> Hallo Natalie, > > On Wednesday 31 August 2005 14:13, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Current IA32 CPU hotplug code doesn't allow bringing up processors > > that were not present in the boot configuration. To make > existing hot > > plug facility more practical for physical hot plug, possible

Re: Re: [patch 1/1] Hot plug CPU to support physical add of new processors (i386)

2005-09-01 Thread mika.penttila
We should probably also not to try to boot disabled cpus in smp_boot_cpus()... --Mika - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at

Re: [patch 1/1] Hot plug CPU to support physical add of new processors (i386)

2005-09-01 Thread Andi Kleen
Hallo Natalie, On Wednesday 31 August 2005 14:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Current IA32 CPU hotplug code doesn't allow bringing up processors that > were not present in the boot configuration. To make existing hot plug > facility more practical for physical hot plug, possible processors should >

Re: [patch 1/1] Hot plug CPU to support physical add of new processors (i386)

2005-09-01 Thread Shaohua Li
Hi, On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 20:13 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Current IA32 CPU hotplug code doesn't allow bringing up processors > that were not present in the boot configuration. > To make existing hot plug facility more practical for physical hot > plug, possible processors should be encoun