>-Original Message-
>From: Ingo Molnar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Samstag, 15. Dezember 2007 08:30
>another detail: shouldnt this be structured so that the APIs are
>introduced in kernel/ptrace.c, and that the architecture offers the
>mechanism. (which would thus be
-Original Message-
From: Ingo Molnar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Samstag, 15. Dezember 2007 08:30
another detail: shouldnt this be structured so that the APIs are
introduced in kernel/ptrace.c, and that the architecture offers the
mechanism. (which would thus be ptrace-independent)
Markus,
i've applied the first 4 patches to x86.git.
another detail: shouldnt this be structured so that the APIs are
introduced in kernel/ptrace.c, and that the architecture offers the
mechanism. (which would thus be ptrace-independent) This would also open
these APIs up to kernel-internal
Markus,
i've applied the first 4 patches to x86.git.
another detail: shouldnt this be structured so that the APIs are
introduced in kernel/ptrace.c, and that the architecture offers the
mechanism. (which would thus be ptrace-independent) This would also open
these APIs up to kernel-internal
4 matches
Mail list logo
