From: Denys Vlasenko
> Sent: 03 July 2018 12:59
>
> On 07/03/2018 10:46 AM, David Laight wrote:
> > From: Jan Beulich
> >> Sent: 03 July 2018 09:36
> > ...
> >> As said there, omitting suffixes from instructions in AT mode is bad
> >> practice when operand size cannot be determined by the
From: Denys Vlasenko
> Sent: 03 July 2018 12:59
>
> On 07/03/2018 10:46 AM, David Laight wrote:
> > From: Jan Beulich
> >> Sent: 03 July 2018 09:36
> > ...
> >> As said there, omitting suffixes from instructions in AT mode is bad
> >> practice when operand size cannot be determined by the
On 07/03/2018 10:46 AM, David Laight wrote:
From: Jan Beulich
Sent: 03 July 2018 09:36
...
As said there, omitting suffixes from instructions in AT mode is bad
practice when operand size cannot be determined by the assembler from
register operands, and is likely going to be warned about by
On 07/03/2018 10:46 AM, David Laight wrote:
From: Jan Beulich
Sent: 03 July 2018 09:36
...
As said there, omitting suffixes from instructions in AT mode is bad
practice when operand size cannot be determined by the assembler from
register operands, and is likely going to be warned about by
From: Jan Beulich
> Sent: 03 July 2018 11:07
> >>> On 03.07.18 at 10:46, wrote:
> > From: Jan Beulich
> >> Sent: 03 July 2018 09:36
> > ...
> >> As said there, omitting suffixes from instructions in AT mode is bad
> >> practice when operand size cannot be determined by the assembler from
> >>
From: Jan Beulich
> Sent: 03 July 2018 11:07
> >>> On 03.07.18 at 10:46, wrote:
> > From: Jan Beulich
> >> Sent: 03 July 2018 09:36
> > ...
> >> As said there, omitting suffixes from instructions in AT mode is bad
> >> practice when operand size cannot be determined by the assembler from
> >>
>>> On 03.07.18 at 10:46, wrote:
> From: Jan Beulich
>> Sent: 03 July 2018 09:36
> ...
>> As said there, omitting suffixes from instructions in AT mode is bad
>> practice when operand size cannot be determined by the assembler from
>> register operands, and is likely going to be warned about by
>>> On 03.07.18 at 10:46, wrote:
> From: Jan Beulich
>> Sent: 03 July 2018 09:36
> ...
>> As said there, omitting suffixes from instructions in AT mode is bad
>> practice when operand size cannot be determined by the assembler from
>> register operands, and is likely going to be warned about by
From: Jan Beulich
> Sent: 03 July 2018 09:36
...
> As said there, omitting suffixes from instructions in AT mode is bad
> practice when operand size cannot be determined by the assembler from
> register operands, and is likely going to be warned about by upstream
> gas in the future (mine does
From: Jan Beulich
> Sent: 03 July 2018 09:36
...
> As said there, omitting suffixes from instructions in AT mode is bad
> practice when operand size cannot be determined by the assembler from
> register operands, and is likely going to be warned about by upstream
> gas in the future (mine does
10 matches
Mail list logo