From: Andy Shevchenko [mailto:andy.shevche...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 4:19 PM
>Can you send v9 with Cc to me and Heikki?
No problem
>My concerns here are a) to split refactor part (check LCR), and b) do the
>actual feature enhancement.
I will split this into couple of
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 12:57 AM, Noam Camus wrote:
> From: Greg KH
> Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 8:57 AM
>
>> Please make it against my tty-testing branch of tty.git on
> git.kernel.org, that is the issue here, you are working against a
> "clean" tree, not one with all of the other tty/serial
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 12:57 AM, Noam Camus wrote:
> From: Greg KH
> Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 8:57 AM
>
>> Please make it against my tty-testing branch of tty.git on
> git.kernel.org, that is the issue here, you are working against a
> "clean"
From: Andy Shevchenko [mailto:andy.shevche...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 4:19 PM
>Can you send v9 with Cc to me and Heikki?
No problem
>My concerns here are a) to split refactor part (check LCR), and b) do the
>actual feature enhancement.
I will split this into couple of
From: Greg KH
Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 8:57 AM
> Please make it against my tty-testing branch of tty.git on
git.kernel.org, that is the issue here, you are working against a
"clean" tree, not one with all of the other tty/serial changes in it.
I havn't see any respond for my v8 of this
From: Greg KH
Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 8:57 AM
> Please make it against my tty-testing branch of tty.git on
git.kernel.org, that is the issue here, you are working against a
"clean" tree, not one with all of the other tty/serial changes in it.
I havn't see any
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 05:30:23AM +, Noam Camus wrote:
> > From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
> > Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 7:06 AM
>
> > This patch still doesn't apply at all to my tty-next branch, what are you
> > making it against?
>
> > Please fix it up and resend.
> From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
> Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 7:06 AM
> This patch still doesn't apply at all to my tty-next branch, what are you
> making it against?
> Please fix it up and resend.
The patch is against v4.3-rc4
I will update to rc5
thanks,
Noam Camus
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 11:53:30AM +0300, Noam Camus wrote:
> From: Noam Camus
>
> Add support for UPIO_MEM32BE in addition to UPIO_MEM32.
> dw8250_serial_out32() extra functionality that is not part of
> the 8250 core driver was moved to new function called
> dw8250_check_LCR().
>
> For big
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 11:53:30AM +0300, Noam Camus wrote:
> From: Noam Camus
>
> Add support for UPIO_MEM32BE in addition to UPIO_MEM32.
> dw8250_serial_out32() extra functionality that is not part of
> the 8250 core driver was moved to new function called
>
> From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
> Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 7:06 AM
> This patch still doesn't apply at all to my tty-next branch, what are you
> making it against?
> Please fix it up and resend.
The patch is against v4.3-rc4
I will update to rc5
thanks,
Noam Camus
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 05:30:23AM +, Noam Camus wrote:
> > From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
> > Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 7:06 AM
>
> > This patch still doesn't apply at all to my tty-next branch, what are you
> > making it against?
>
> > Please fix it up and resend.
12 matches
Mail list logo