RE: {standard input}:136: Error: number (0x9000000080000000) larger than 32 bits

2016-04-21 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, Matthew Fortune wrote: > > I have a fix in the works and to have it integrated upstream I just > > need to accompany it with suitable cases -- like the fragment above -- > > for the GAS testsuite. I'll send an update when it's ready. > > I do not think the change in

RE: {standard input}:136: Error: number (0x9000000080000000) larger than 32 bits

2016-04-21 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, Matthew Fortune wrote: > > I have a fix in the works and to have it integrated upstream I just > > need to accompany it with suitable cases -- like the fragment above -- > > for the GAS testsuite. I'll send an update when it's ready. > > I do not think the change in

RE: {standard input}:136: Error: number (0x9000000080000000) larger than 32 bits

2016-04-19 Thread Matthew Fortune
Maciej Rozycki writes: > On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > > The thing is that to match some software's (such as ours) > > requirements an ISA override -- as a side effect -- relaxes ABI > > restrictions on certain operations. E.g. the DLI macro and

RE: {standard input}:136: Error: number (0x9000000080000000) larger than 32 bits

2016-04-19 Thread Matthew Fortune
Maciej Rozycki writes: > On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > > The thing is that to match some software's (such as ours) > > requirements an ISA override -- as a side effect -- relaxes ABI > > restrictions on certain operations. E.g. the DLI macro and its 64-bit > > immediate

Re: {standard input}:136: Error: number (0x9000000080000000) larger than 32 bits

2016-04-18 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > The thing is that to match some software's (such as ours) requirements an > ISA override -- as a side effect -- relaxes ABI restrictions on certain > operations. E.g. the DLI macro and its 64-bit immediate argument are not > valid in the o32

Re: {standard input}:136: Error: number (0x9000000080000000) larger than 32 bits

2016-04-18 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > The thing is that to match some software's (such as ours) requirements an > ISA override -- as a side effect -- relaxes ABI restrictions on certain > operations. E.g. the DLI macro and its 64-bit immediate argument are not > valid in the o32

Re: {standard input}:136: Error: number (0x9000000080000000) larger than 32 bits

2016-04-18 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, Ralf Baechle wrote: > I extracted a rather simple test case: > > $ echo >> testcase .s << EOF > .setmips3 > dli $2, 0x90008000 > EOF > $ mips-linux-as -mips3 -march=r4600 -o testcase.o testcase.s > testcase.s: Assembler messages: >

Re: {standard input}:136: Error: number (0x9000000080000000) larger than 32 bits

2016-04-18 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, Ralf Baechle wrote: > I extracted a rather simple test case: > > $ echo >> testcase .s << EOF > .setmips3 > dli $2, 0x90008000 > EOF > $ mips-linux-as -mips3 -march=r4600 -o testcase.o testcase.s > testcase.s: Assembler messages: >

Re: {standard input}:136: Error: number (0x9000000080000000) larger than 32 bits

2016-04-18 Thread Ralf Baechle
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 03:25:56PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, Ralf Baechle wrote: > > > The old case btw, affects ip22 with a random_config: > > > > CC arch/mips/mm/sc-ip22.o > > {standard input}: Assembler messages: > > {standard input}:137: Error: number

Re: {standard input}:136: Error: number (0x9000000080000000) larger than 32 bits

2016-04-18 Thread Ralf Baechle
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 03:25:56PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, Ralf Baechle wrote: > > > The old case btw, affects ip22 with a random_config: > > > > CC arch/mips/mm/sc-ip22.o > > {standard input}: Assembler messages: > > {standard input}:137: Error: number

Re: {standard input}:136: Error: number (0x9000000080000000) larger than 32 bits

2016-04-18 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, Ralf Baechle wrote: > The old case btw, affects ip22 with a random_config: > > CC arch/mips/mm/sc-ip22.o > {standard input}: Assembler messages: > {standard input}:137: Error: number (0x90008000) larger than 32 bits > {standard input}:162: Error: number

Re: {standard input}:136: Error: number (0x9000000080000000) larger than 32 bits

2016-04-18 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, Ralf Baechle wrote: > The old case btw, affects ip22 with a random_config: > > CC arch/mips/mm/sc-ip22.o > {standard input}: Assembler messages: > {standard input}:137: Error: number (0x90008000) larger than 32 bits > {standard input}:162: Error: number

Re: {standard input}:136: Error: number (0x9000000080000000) larger than 32 bits

2016-04-18 Thread Ralf Baechle
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 03:43:49PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > > > > > >{standard input}: Assembler messages: > > > >> {standard input}:136: Error: number (0x90008000) larger than > > > >> 32 bits > > >{standard input}:161:

Re: {standard input}:136: Error: number (0x9000000080000000) larger than 32 bits

2016-04-18 Thread Ralf Baechle
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 03:43:49PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > > > > > >{standard input}: Assembler messages: > > > >> {standard input}:136: Error: number (0x90008000) larger than > > > >> 32 bits > > >{standard input}:161:

Re: {standard input}:136: Error: number (0x9000000080000000) larger than 32 bits

2016-04-17 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
Ralf, > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > > > >{standard input}: Assembler messages: > > >> {standard input}:136: Error: number (0x90008000) larger than 32 > > >> bits > >{standard input}:161: Error: number (0x90008000) larger than 32 > > bits > > This is a

Re: {standard input}:136: Error: number (0x9000000080000000) larger than 32 bits

2016-04-17 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
Ralf, > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > > > >{standard input}: Assembler messages: > > >> {standard input}:136: Error: number (0x90008000) larger than 32 > > >> bits > >{standard input}:161: Error: number (0x90008000) larger than 32 > > bits > > This is a

Re: {standard input}:136: Error: number (0x9000000080000000) larger than 32 bits

2016-04-16 Thread Ralf Baechle
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 08:20:38AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: > FYI, the error/warning still remains. > > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git > master > head: 306a63bee192859ebd32c7328c7766636d882d8f > commit:

Re: {standard input}:136: Error: number (0x9000000080000000) larger than 32 bits

2016-04-16 Thread Ralf Baechle
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 08:20:38AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: > FYI, the error/warning still remains. > > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git > master > head: 306a63bee192859ebd32c7328c7766636d882d8f > commit: