Re: BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0 on BeagleBone

2012-12-19 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 12/19/2012 10:44 PM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote: > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:55:24, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> On 12/19/2012 8:48 PM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote: >>> I tried out 3 variants of AM335x boards - 2 of these (BeagleBone and EVM) >>> have DDR2 >>> and 1 has DDR3 (EVM-SK). The BUG is triggered on

RE: BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0 on BeagleBone

2012-12-19 Thread Bedia, Vaibhav
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:55:24, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 12/19/2012 8:48 PM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote: > > I tried out 3 variants of AM335x boards - 2 of these (BeagleBone and EVM) > > have DDR2 > > and 1 has DDR3 (EVM-SK). The BUG is triggered on all of these at the same > > point. > > > > With

Re: BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0 on BeagleBone

2012-12-19 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 12/19/2012 8:48 PM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote: > I tried out 3 variants of AM335x boards - 2 of these (BeagleBone and EVM) > have DDR2 > and 1 has DDR3 (EVM-SK). The BUG is triggered on all of these at the same > point. > > With Stephen's change I don't see this on any of the board variants :) >

RE: BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0 on BeagleBone

2012-12-19 Thread Bedia, Vaibhav
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 01:53:42, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 12/19/12 08:53, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Dec 2012, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote: > > > >> Current mainline on Beaglebone using the omap2plus_defconfig + 3 build > >> fixes > >> is triggering a BUG() > > ... > > > >> [0.109688]

Re: BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0 on BeagleBone

2012-12-19 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 12/19/12 08:53, Paul Walmsley wrote: > On Wed, 19 Dec 2012, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote: > >> Current mainline on Beaglebone using the omap2plus_defconfig + 3 build fixes >> is triggering a BUG() > ... > >> [0.109688] Security Framework initialized >> [0.109889] Mount-cache hash table entries:

Re: BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0 on BeagleBone

2012-12-19 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 12/19/12 08:53, Paul Walmsley wrote: On Wed, 19 Dec 2012, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote: Current mainline on Beaglebone using the omap2plus_defconfig + 3 build fixes is triggering a BUG() ... [0.109688] Security Framework initialized [0.109889] Mount-cache hash table entries: 512 [

RE: BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0 on BeagleBone

2012-12-19 Thread Bedia, Vaibhav
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 01:53:42, Stephen Boyd wrote: On 12/19/12 08:53, Paul Walmsley wrote: On Wed, 19 Dec 2012, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote: Current mainline on Beaglebone using the omap2plus_defconfig + 3 build fixes is triggering a BUG() ... [0.109688] Security Framework

Re: BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0 on BeagleBone

2012-12-19 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 12/19/2012 8:48 PM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote: I tried out 3 variants of AM335x boards - 2 of these (BeagleBone and EVM) have DDR2 and 1 has DDR3 (EVM-SK). The BUG is triggered on all of these at the same point. With Stephen's change I don't see this on any of the board variants :) New

RE: BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0 on BeagleBone

2012-12-19 Thread Bedia, Vaibhav
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:55:24, Stephen Boyd wrote: On 12/19/2012 8:48 PM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote: I tried out 3 variants of AM335x boards - 2 of these (BeagleBone and EVM) have DDR2 and 1 has DDR3 (EVM-SK). The BUG is triggered on all of these at the same point. With Stephen's

Re: BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0 on BeagleBone

2012-12-19 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 12/19/2012 10:44 PM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote: On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:55:24, Stephen Boyd wrote: On 12/19/2012 8:48 PM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote: I tried out 3 variants of AM335x boards - 2 of these (BeagleBone and EVM) have DDR2 and 1 has DDR3 (EVM-SK). The BUG is triggered on all of these