Hello,
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 01:21:12PM +0530, Shyam Kaushik wrote:
> Any chances of backporting some parts of fix to <3.9 kernels?
For kernels which are too old for -stable, backporting is up to the
distros which hopefully are still maintaining the kernel (you really
don't want to run an
: Shyam Kaushik
Cc: Tejun Heo; Andrew Morton; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG REPORT - IDR wraps around at 30-bits - works very bad
with NFSD/SCTP
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:51:14PM +0530, Shyam Kaushik wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Unfortunately we don't have a 3.9/3.10 environment
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 1:03 PM
To: Shyam Kaushik
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG REPORT - IDR wraps around at 30-bits - works very bad
with NFSD/SCTP
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:31:29PM +0530, Shyam Kaushik wrote:
> pr_info("%d\n", MAX_INT);
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:31:29PM +0530, Shyam Kaushik wrote:
> pr_info("%d\n", MAX_INT);
How did this line build, there is no MAX_INT in the kernel tree.
odd.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:51:14PM +0530, Shyam Kaushik wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Unfortunately we dont have a 3.9/3.10 environment here. So if IDR
> developers can try the example code, it should show if the bug is still
> present in there. Thanks.
There shouldn't be anything in 3.10 preventing
PM
To: Shyam Kaushik
Cc: Tejun Heo; Andrew Morton; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG REPORT - IDR wraps around at 30-bits - works very bad
with NFSD/SCTP
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:31:29PM +0530, Shyam Kaushik wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> We are using Ubuntu linux kernel 3.2.0-2
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:31:29PM +0530, Shyam Kaushik wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> We are using Ubuntu linux kernel 3.2.0-25-generic & 3.8.13-030813-generic
> in our environments, but I think this bug is still present in mainline
> kernel. Clients of IDR rollover at MAX_INT (NFSD & SCTP in kernel do
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:31:29PM +0530, Shyam Kaushik wrote:
Hi Folks,
We are using Ubuntu linux kernel 3.2.0-25-generic 3.8.13-030813-generic
in our environments, but I think this bug is still present in mainline
kernel. Clients of IDR rollover at MAX_INT (NFSD SCTP in kernel do this)
PM
To: Shyam Kaushik
Cc: Tejun Heo; Andrew Morton; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG REPORT - IDR wraps around at 30-bits - works very bad
with NFSD/SCTP
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:31:29PM +0530, Shyam Kaushik wrote:
Hi Folks,
We are using Ubuntu linux kernel 3.2.0-25-generic
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:51:14PM +0530, Shyam Kaushik wrote:
Hi Greg,
Unfortunately we dont have a 3.9/3.10 environment here. So if IDR
developers can try the example code, it should show if the bug is still
present in there. Thanks.
There shouldn't be anything in 3.10 preventing you
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:31:29PM +0530, Shyam Kaushik wrote:
pr_info(%d\n, MAX_INT);
How did this line build, there is no MAX_INT in the kernel tree.
odd.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to
]
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 1:03 PM
To: Shyam Kaushik
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG REPORT - IDR wraps around at 30-bits - works very bad
with NFSD/SCTP
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:31:29PM +0530, Shyam Kaushik wrote:
pr_info(%d\n, MAX_INT);
How did this line build
Kaushik
Cc: Tejun Heo; Andrew Morton; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG REPORT - IDR wraps around at 30-bits - works very bad
with NFSD/SCTP
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:51:14PM +0530, Shyam Kaushik wrote:
Hi Greg,
Unfortunately we don't have a 3.9/3.10 environment here. So if IDR
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 01:21:12PM +0530, Shyam Kaushik wrote:
Any chances of backporting some parts of fix to 3.9 kernels?
For kernels which are too old for -stable, backporting is up to the
distros which hopefully are still maintaining the kernel (you really
don't want to run an
14 matches
Mail list logo
