Re: Fwd: Hid over I2C and ACPI interaction

2012-07-09 Thread Mika Westerberg
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 11:24:45AM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote: > I think we can add new interface to get acpi specific resources. e.g > struct acpi_resource pnp_get_acpi_resource(...). When the pnp acpi devices > were initialized, put those acpi specific resources into a new resource list > pnpdev->ac

Re: Fwd: Hid over I2C and ACPI interaction

2012-07-09 Thread Lan Tianyu
gt; w.s...@pengutronix.de; l...@kernel.org; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org; linux- >> i...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; jkos...@suse.cz; >> cha...@enac.fr; jj_d...@emc.com.tw; bhelg...@google.com; abe...@mit.edu >> Subject: Re: Fwd: Hid over I2C and ACPI interaction >> &g

RE: Fwd: Hid over I2C and ACPI interaction

2012-07-08 Thread Moore, Robert
.@mit.edu >Subject: Re: Fwd: Hid over I2C and ACPI interaction > >On 2012年07月06日 13:52, Mika Westerberg wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 03:01:57PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote: >>> +Note that although these are ACPI devices, we prefer to use PnP drivers >>> for them, >&

Re: Fwd: Hid over I2C and ACPI interaction

2012-07-08 Thread Lan Tianyu
On 2012年07月06日 13:52, Mika Westerberg wrote: On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 03:01:57PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote: +Note that although these are ACPI devices, we prefer to use PnP drivers for them, +this is because: +1. all the non-ACPI-predefined Devices are exported as PnP devices as well +2. PnP bus is

Re: Fwd: Hid over I2C and ACPI interaction

2012-07-08 Thread Zhang Rui
On 四, 2012-07-05 at 10:44 +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > Hi, > > Many thanks for these information. It seems like I was on the right > track, but I didn't saw the hidden part of the iceberg. yep. > I've already written the i2c slave part (and the acpi handling to get > the HID register by us