RE: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]

2006-12-13 Thread Hua Zhong
> I think allowing binary hardware drivers in userspace hurts > our ability to leverage companies to release hardware specs. If filesystems can be in user space, why can't drivers be in user space? On what *technical* ground? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]

2006-12-13 Thread Martin J. Bligh
Linus Torvalds wrote: On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Greg KH wrote: Numerous kernel developers feel that loading non-GPL drivers into the kernel violates the license of the kernel and their copyright. Because of this, a one year notice for everyone to address any non-GPL compatible modules has been

Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]

2006-12-13 Thread Bill Nottingham
Greg KH ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > An updated version is below. If you're adding this, you should probably schedule EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for removal at the same time, as this essentially renders that irrelevant. That being said... First, this is adding the measure at module load time. Any

Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]

2006-12-13 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Greg KH wrote: > > Numerous kernel developers feel that loading non-GPL drivers into the > kernel violates the license of the kernel and their copyright. Because > of this, a one year notice for everyone to address any non-GPL > compatible modules has been set. Btw, I

Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]

2006-12-13 Thread Grzegorz Kulewski
Hi, I think that... On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Greg KH wrote: From: Greg Kroah-Hartmna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ... (most probably) there... Subject: Notify non-GPL module loading will be going away in January 2008 Numerous kernel developers feel that loading non-GPL drivers into the kernel violates

Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]

2006-12-13 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 02:30:26AM +0100, Grzegorz Kulewski wrote: > Hi, > > I think that... > > On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Greg KH wrote: > >From: Greg Kroah-Hartmna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > ... (most probably) there... > > >Subject: Notify non-GPL module loading will be going away in January 2008 >

Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]

2006-12-13 Thread Michael K. Edwards
fish for birds alone? no, teach suits how to leave more fish to go around Cheers, - Michael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the

Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]

2006-12-13 Thread Jonathan Corbet
Greg's patch: > + printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: This module will not be able " > + "to be loaded after January 1, 2008 due to its " > + "license.\n", mod->name); If you're going to go ahead with this, shouldn't the message

Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]

2006-12-13 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Greg KH wrote: > > Full bellies of fish > Penguins sleep under the moon > Dream of wings that fly Snif. That touched me deep inside. Linus PS. Or maybe it was the curry I ate yesterday. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]

2006-12-13 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 05:43:29PM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > Greg's patch: > > > + printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: This module will not be able " > > + "to be loaded after January 1, 2008 due to its " > > + "license.\n",

Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]

2006-12-13 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 02:09:11PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 01:47:21PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:32:50 -0800 > > Martin Bligh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > So let's come out and ban binary modules, rather than pussyfooting > > > around,

Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]

2006-12-13 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 02:09:11PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 01:47:21PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:32:50 -0800 Martin Bligh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So let's come out and ban binary modules, rather than pussyfooting around, if that's what

Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]

2006-12-13 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 05:43:29PM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: Greg's patch: + printk(KERN_WARNING %s: This module will not be able + to be loaded after January 1, 2008 due to its + license.\n, mod-name); If

Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]

2006-12-13 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Greg KH wrote: Full bellies of fish Penguins sleep under the moon Dream of wings that fly Snif. That touched me deep inside. Linus PS. Or maybe it was the curry I ate yesterday. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]

2006-12-13 Thread Michael K. Edwards
fish for birds alone? no, teach suits how to leave more fish to go around Cheers, - Michael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ

Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]

2006-12-13 Thread Jonathan Corbet
Greg's patch: + printk(KERN_WARNING %s: This module will not be able + to be loaded after January 1, 2008 due to its + license.\n, mod-name); If you're going to go ahead with this, shouldn't the message say that the

Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]

2006-12-13 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 02:30:26AM +0100, Grzegorz Kulewski wrote: Hi, I think that... On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Greg KH wrote: From: Greg Kroah-Hartmna [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... (most probably) there... Subject: Notify non-GPL module loading will be going away in January 2008 Numerous

Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]

2006-12-13 Thread Grzegorz Kulewski
Hi, I think that... On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Greg KH wrote: From: Greg Kroah-Hartmna [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... (most probably) there... Subject: Notify non-GPL module loading will be going away in January 2008 Numerous kernel developers feel that loading non-GPL drivers into the kernel violates

Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]

2006-12-13 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Greg KH wrote: Numerous kernel developers feel that loading non-GPL drivers into the kernel violates the license of the kernel and their copyright. Because of this, a one year notice for everyone to address any non-GPL compatible modules has been set. Btw, I really

Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]

2006-12-13 Thread Bill Nottingham
Greg KH ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: An updated version is below. If you're adding this, you should probably schedule EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for removal at the same time, as this essentially renders that irrelevant. That being said... First, this is adding the measure at module load time. Any

Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]

2006-12-13 Thread Martin J. Bligh
Linus Torvalds wrote: On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Greg KH wrote: Numerous kernel developers feel that loading non-GPL drivers into the kernel violates the license of the kernel and their copyright. Because of this, a one year notice for everyone to address any non-GPL compatible modules has been

RE: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]

2006-12-13 Thread Hua Zhong
I think allowing binary hardware drivers in userspace hurts our ability to leverage companies to release hardware specs. If filesystems can be in user space, why can't drivers be in user space? On what *technical* ground? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe

Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]

2006-12-13 Thread Nigel Cunningham
Hi. Good arguments have already been put against it, so I'll just keep it short and sweet (FWIW) Nacked-by: Nigel Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regards, Nigel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo

Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]

2006-12-13 Thread Jeffrey V. Merkey
Well said, and I agree with ALL of your statements contained in this post. About damn time this was addressed. Jeff Linus Torvalds wrote: On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Greg KH wrote: Numerous kernel developers feel that loading non-GPL drivers into the kernel violates the license of the kernel

<    1   2   3   4   5