On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 11:45:38AM -0700, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> If IBM would provide a CD image (bootable ISO) containing FW for all
> supported drives - that would be great. No need for the "other OS" any
> more.
I can imagine IBM doesn't do that because in that way you can't update
the firm
--- Erik Mouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 11:45:38AM -0700, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> > If IBM would provide a CD image (bootable ISO) containing FW for
> all
> > supported drives - that would be great. No need for the "other OS"
> any
> > more.
>
> I can imagine IBM doe
--- Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have the feeling that this will work for many T4[012]p? users:
>
>
http://www-307.ibm.com/pc/support/site.wss/document.do?lndocid=TPAD-HDFIRM
>
Actually, I think your feeling is wrong. Looking at the readme.txt it
seems version 7.1 of the upgra
You can take the .exe file and turn this into a bootable CD (using a RW CD) I
forgot how I did it, but if I remember correctly, I took a floppy dos image
and made that into the boot 'stub' and threw the exe into the CD (a la
El-Torito).
I flashed the disk firmware once since I got the laptop.
--- Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 10:14 -0700, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> > Basically I saw that the only difference between me and Pekka was
> the
> > FW (discounting the different CPU speed and Kernel version). I
> googled
> > around and found the IBM FW page at:
On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 10:14 -0700, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> Basically I saw that the only difference between me and Pekka was the
> FW (discounting the different CPU speed and Kernel version). I googled
> around and found the IBM FW page at:
>
> http://www-306.ibm.com/pc/support/site.wss/documen
--- Alejandro Bonilla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > --- Pekka Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On 7/7/05, Martin Knoblauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Interesting. Same Notebook, same drive. The program say "not
> > > parked"
> > > > :-( This is on FC2 with a pretty much van
> --- Pekka Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 7/7/05, Martin Knoblauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Interesting. Same Notebook, same drive. The program say "not
> > parked"
> > > :-( This is on FC2 with a pretty much vanilla 2.6.9 kernel.
> > >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]# hdparm -i
--- Pekka Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/7/05, Martin Knoblauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Interesting. Same Notebook, same drive. The program say "not
> parked"
> > :-( This is on FC2 with a pretty much vanilla 2.6.9 kernel.
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]# hdparm -i /dev/hda
> >
Model: HTS548080M9AT00 (Hitachi)
Laptop: T42.
segfault:/home/spstarr# ./a /dev/hda
head parked
Seems to park, heard it click :)
Shawn.
On July 7, 2005 04:48, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07 2005, Lenz Grimmer wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Je
# ./park /dev/hda
head not parked 4c
# hdparm -i /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
Model=HTS548040M9AT00, FwRev=MG2OA53A, SerialNo=MRL252L2JU2JYB
Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec Fixed DTR>10Mbs }
RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=4
BuffType=DualPortCache, BuffSize=7877kB, MaxMultSect
--- Pekka Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Martin, don't trim the cc!
>
sorry about that, but I did not have the CC at time of reply. I read
LKLM from the archives and respond by cut and paste.
Martin
--
Martin Knoblauch
email: k n
On 7/7/05, Martin Knoblauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Interesting. Same Notebook, same drive. The program say "not parked"
> :-( This is on FC2 with a pretty much vanilla 2.6.9 kernel.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]# uname -a
> Linux l15833 2.6.9-noagp #1 Wed May 4 16:09:14 CEST 2005 i686 i686 i38
On 7/7/05, Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did it say 'head parked'? If the drive is idle, you wont hear anything.
> Laptop drives auto-park really quickly themselves. A time ./park
> /dev/hda should tell you whether it needed to park or not, if it
> executes faster than a few hundred ms it
On Thu, Jul 07 2005, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > ATA7 defines a park maneuvre, I don't know how well supported it is
> > > yet though. You can test with this little app, if it says 'head
> > > parked' it works. If not, it has just idled the drive.
>
> On 7/7/05, Lenz Grimmer <[EM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Jens Axboe wrote:
> Very cool, I wasn't sure if this was a 'new' feature waiting to be
> implemented in drives or if ata7 just documented existing use in some
> drives.
>
> How long did the park take? Spec states it can take up to 500ms.
Hard
Jens Axboe wrote:
> > ATA7 defines a park maneuvre, I don't know how well supported it is
> > yet though. You can test with this little app, if it says 'head
> > parked' it works. If not, it has just idled the drive.
On 7/7/05, Lenz Grimmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Great! Thanks for digging th
On Thu, Jul 07 2005, Lenz Grimmer wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> > ATA7 defines a park maneuvre, I don't know how well supported it is
> > yet though. You can test with this little app, if it says 'head
> > parked' it works. If not, i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Jens Axboe wrote:
> ATA7 defines a park maneuvre, I don't know how well supported it is
> yet though. You can test with this little app, if it says 'head
> parked' it works. If not, it has just idled the drive.
Great! Thanks for digging this u
19 matches
Mail list logo
