Hi Linda,
Are you having variable transfer rates based on the zone access point?
If this is the case it is correctly reporting slow on the ID of the LBA
range v/s the OD on the media.
Regards,
Andre Hedrick
CTO Timpanogas Research Group
EVP Linux Development, TRG
Linux ATA Development
-
To
it's a rate near 5. So it still doesn't make sense.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andries Brouwer
> Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 4:59 PM
> To: LA Walsh
> Cc: lkml
> Subject: Re: IDE0 /dev/hda performance
it's a rate near 5. So it still doesn't make sense.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andries Brouwer
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 4:59 PM
To: LA Walsh
Cc: lkml
Subject: Re: IDE0 /dev/hda performance hit in 2217 on my HW - more
Hi Linda,
Are you having variable transfer rates based on the zone access point?
If this is the case it is correctly reporting slow on the ID of the LBA
range v/s the OD on the media.
Regards,
Andre Hedrick
CTO Timpanogas Research Group
EVP Linux Development, TRG
Linux ATA Development
-
To
, the
math
says it's a rate near 5m/s. So it still doesn't make sense.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andries Brouwer
> Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 4:59 PM
> To: LA Walsh
> Cc: lkml
> Subject: Re: IDE0 /dev/hda pe
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 03:47:27PM -0800, LA Walsh wrote:
> Some further information in response to a private email, I did hdparm -ti
> under both
> 2216 and 2217 -- they are identical -- this may be something weird
> w/extended partitions...
What nonsense. There is nothing special with
Some further information in response to a private email, I did hdparm -ti
under both
2216 and 2217 -- they are identical -- this may be something weird
w/extended
partitions...
/dev/hda:
multcount= 0 (off)
I/O support = 0 (default 16-bit)
unmaskirq= 0 (off)
using_dma= 1 (on)
Some further information in response to a private email, I did hdparm -ti
under both
2216 and 2217 -- they are identical -- this may be something weird
w/extended
partitions...
/dev/hda:
multcount= 0 (off)
I/O support = 0 (default 16-bit)
unmaskirq= 0 (off)
using_dma= 1 (on)
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 03:47:27PM -0800, LA Walsh wrote:
Some further information in response to a private email, I did hdparm -ti
under both
2216 and 2217 -- they are identical -- this may be something weird
w/extended partitions...
What nonsense. There is nothing special with extended
, the
math
says it's a rate near 5m/s. So it still doesn't make sense.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andries Brouwer
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 4:59 PM
To: LA Walsh
Cc: lkml
Subject: Re: IDE0 /dev/hda performance hit in 2217 on my
10 matches
Mail list logo
