RE: ISSUE: Linux bug/restriction prevents multicast participation

2000-09-15 Thread Matthew Delco
I'd like to thank everyone who replied. For the sake of brevity I'm replying with one message instead of several individual replies. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] asked "Sounds like a bug in the protocols. Why this restriction?" The complete port assignment specification is: from toapplication pri

Re: ISSUE: Linux bug/restriction prevents multicast participation

2000-09-14 Thread Alan Cox
> 49152-65535 be used for video traffic. From my observations, Linux does not > allow user processes to use multicast sessions with ports 61000+, and This depends if you configured masquerading if so then it uses those ports. Rebuild without masquerading - To unsubscribe from this list: send th

Re: ISSUE: Linux bug/restriction prevents multicast participation

2000-09-14 Thread Meelis Roos
MD> Full description: Multicast standards prescribe that the port range MD> 49152-65535 be used for video traffic. From my observations, Linux does not MD> allow user processes to use multicast sessions with ports 61000+, and MD> therefore Linux can not participate in many multicast video session

Re: ISSUE: Linux bug/restriction prevents multicast participation

2000-09-14 Thread Andi Kleen
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 12:40:01AM -0700, Matthew Delco wrote: > Bug report form (as suggested by the old mailing list FAQ) > -- > > Summary: A bug/misguided restriction in Linux prevents users from > participating in certain multicast video